and not only. a film who creates one of many Nerone's portraits. not extraordinary but decent. only sin - the fear of Hans Matheson to explore new solutions for create his role more than copy of other emperor's representations. but he does a beautiful role, not real profound but honest, powerful and realistic. like many historical movies, the accuracy is not the best point and, in many scenes, Nerone seems be only sketch. but it is a good choice for an evening after work day, as mixture of history and crumbs of fairy tale, remembering Quo Vadis and the representation of the Roman emperor in different novels and in cinema. sure, the stereotypes are not the inspired ingredients and the story of Nerone could be more a story "ad usum Delphini" but the result is far to be bad.

One of the greatest things about this obscure and lengthy German/Italian TV video is that it contains none of the over-famous and over-paid Hollywood faces that plague us in the usual video-store fare. Another huge advantage is that, being set in Ancient Rome, it will never feature a hideous American gas-guzzling automobile, neither will characters use a telephone or wear mass-produced off-the-peg clothing. It also eschews those tedious set-pieces with a "cast of thousands" that the Hollywood egomaniacs feel obliged to deliver. Instead, it is a love story between two young people raised in rustic simplicity in a country villa. Their love is interrupted by fate, and the rest is 90 minutes of turmoil as Claudius the healthy peasant boy becomes Nero the tortured idealist who in despair ultimately dies by his own hand.I gather from other comments that the story has little historical accuracy, but neither did Ben Hur nor The Ten Commandments. Hans Matheson as Nero makes a decent job of a difficult role. He transitions from simple country boy to deranged paladin effectively enough considering the complications of episodic scripting and Italian TV boss Berlusconi's feeble brain-power. When Poppea drugged him, I felt sorry: he would obviously never be the same again, and indeed, he did condemn the lover of his youth, Acte (popular German TV actress Rike Schmid), to death as a Christian, but more probably because she was taller than he. This is for fans of films set in Ancient Rome, who do not have PhDs in Roman history. As such it works fine: settle back for three hours of togas and treachery and take no notice of the self-appointed experts.

As a ravenous devourer of all films set in the ancient world, but especially the Roman ones, as soon as I found out this and "Augustus" are part of a larger programme, I had to uncover the remaining pieces to be filmed. As culled from the production company website, they are as follows:Miniseries completed: Augusto/Augustus and Nerone/Nero Miniseries in production: San Pietro/Saint Peter, Pompei/Pompeii, Costantino/Constantine and La Caduta dell'Impero/The fall of the empire.So it would appear that the series will not focus only on 'imperium' per se, that is emperors and all that. But instead, it will feature some historical events and important characters peripheral to Rome proper (in this case, St. Peter). Much as I don't like the Christian flicks, one cannot look at all Rome's history and shrug it off. But, for my part, I look forward to the Constantine piece. TThe man hasn't been 'filmed' much and I cannot locate the one that I know of on DVD anywhere.

OK, we all know that historical movies are full of inexactitudes, the list is so long, Troy was a disaster, and Brad Pitt acting was horrible, any movies done on Joan of arc was to laugh about, and so on and so on, so why review them pointing on how bad they are with respecting the real story? Sure I don't retain this movie as being Oscar material (then again I saw some winners worst than this movie), but it was entertaining, the set and costume were nice...The only shame was that it was entirely voiced over even for the English speaking actors, and I never get used to hear somebody familiar speak with another voice......