The outcomes of the "simulations" are ridiculous, biased, and just plain and simply stupid. George Washington wasn't even the best American General of all time (not even close), and yet he somehow managed to "win" against Napoleon Bonaparte. Yes, Napoleon. Probably one of the top Generals in the Worlds History, along with Hannibal, Julius Caesar, Alexander,Belisarius, etc.George Washington is not even in the top 100 generals list. He was a great leader, not a great general, and certainly would not stand a chance against Napoleon.And that is just the tip of the iceberg, not worth watching, not even for a minute.

The Deadliest Warrior seems biased with mainly American characters or weapons winning mostly ,i have a military background and i am afraid Napoleon would beat Washington hands down all day long and the Bren gun against the Bar i have fired both and although the Bar is good the accuracy of the Bren is too good to be beaten by the Bar,i have also misgivings about Lawrence of Arabia been beaten by Roosevelt come on a Gatling beating a belt fed water cooled Vickers come on.I could go on but i think they should get real experts since i know two so called experts on the show and they are shall we say not at the top of there field.

Not a bad macho show! My wife though the show was gross, while to my wife's annoyance, I was fixated with the show and did not change the channel. I found the premise interesting. How would soldiers from different cultures, and time fair in combat. The Deadliest Warrior has experts on who give their opinions on weapons medical etc. The strongest part of the series is the demonstrations of what would happen with each weapon. The conclusion is a computer animated program which declare who would win the battle. Something new, and educational for reality TV. Deadliest Warrior is better than other reality TV where one see science and reason instead big egos and shock; however the show is marred with personal opinion. I give Deadliest Warrior with my marred personal opinion a seven out of ten

... And even they aren't that great.The show itself takes an interesting, if unoriginal idea, of pitting warriors of different eras against each other. A few problems though.1)Their experts are arrogant, ignorant, annoying and all too often deliver an opinion that is clearly scripted to create suspense and conflict. However, some of the guests to have impressive skills (I speak of course of the ninja guys).2)The body of the show is filled with so much hyperbole, blatant romanticism, anachronisms, and unbearably 'Hollywood' attitude towards the whole thing that I can't even watch it.3) Their tests are ludicrously poor.4) The whole thing about the computer models is almost certainly BS (Sadly I cannot prove that.) On the other hand, the fight at the end can be pretty cool.While this is certain to attract a certain type of viewer, watch only the first and last 5 minutes if you at all value the integrity of television.