Good-humoured and not too serious fiction about the young Goethe, tall and sometimes gawky Alexander Fehling, during his stint at a law court in the modest Hessian town of Wetzlar.There he falls for the charming, gifted and sexy Lotte Buff (Miriam Stein), but sees her marry for family reasons his rich and influential boss Kestner (Moritz Bleibtreu). He also suffers the loss of his best friend Wilhelm Jerusalem (Volker Bruch), who blows his brains out. Out of these traumas comes a passionate semi-autobiographical novel, "The Sorrows of Young Werther", which overnight makes the still unsure young man a national hero. What Lotte says of the book, that it is not objectively true "Wahrheit" but creatively poetic "Dichtung", applies also to the film. The consummation of their love in a ruined abbey, ending up entwined naked in the mud, with subsequent colds that confine them to their separate beds, is filmed realistically but remains fantasy. More than a nod to Richardson's "Tom Jones" and, in the portrayal of the immortal artist as a young dog, to Shaffer's "Amadeus".

The premise of this movie is intriguing at best. Set in Eighteenth Century Germany, the costumes and scenery are succulent eye candy for the visual epicureans and history buffs alike. Impressively shot and beautifully acted, this movie has the potential to become a staple in any avid period piece fanatics movie library. Some historical inaccuracies aside, this German drama has the potential to be an impressive foreign film. "Goethe" could have easily become one of my favorite "feel good, need a good cry, want to escape from modern life" movie. Sadly, it will not be. The explicit and repetitive use of profanity and nudity (male and female) is unnecessary and spread throughout the movie. Listed as "Unrated", it should be given an "R" rating. A movie that could have been a real film gem was marred by the unnecessary filth added in. If you are somehow able to watch an edited version of this movie without all the junk thrown in, I would recommend it. Otherwise, it is a waste.

Even Goethe was young once (yes I know, some things seem completely ridiculous now don't they) and was not the genius we all came to know ... Wait, do we really know him? Actually I wouldn't claim to know him. So we know his work and may like that or not. Think it's great or not. But what do we know about the human behind that? Only way to make the movie more awkward would have been, to show him as a 2-year old (though that would be almost intriguing ... and I might even line up to watch that). As it is, we get to see him, as we have not seen him before. So the filmmakers have the freedom to show a human side on him. If any of this is based on anything in particular? I wouldn't be able to tell you.What I can tell you, is that this is very light entertainment. It also tells us, that even great persons are people too. If you can live with that and enjoy a little story that has no aim to please anything more than lightweight entertainment, than you can't do anything wrong by watching this

Goethe! is on a mission to rehumanize the godly "prince of poets" Goethe ("with O-E"), and largely succeeds. The movie picks out the period when young Johann is still trying to appease his dad by taking on a day job as assistant to the district attorney (or the mid-18.th- century equivalent to that job description) of boondocksville Wetzlar, after having faltered his legal studies in the much more mundane Strassburg. In other words, immediately before young John's groundbreaking success of "The Sufferings Of Young Werther". Goethe befriends social drop-out Jerusalem, struggles with his staunch superior Kestner, and eventually falls in love with charming ingénue Charlotte Buff, only to lose her to the better-established Kestner. Around the same time, Jerusalem commits suicide after an unhappy love affair with a married woman. Goethe processes his troublesome experiences by writing his first pageturner.To my mind this movie succeeds in bringing Goethe closer to the modern reader -- it only fails on one count: utter historical veracity. It's not a documentary, folks. Goethe failed his doctorate, but possibly not through laziness; what exactly Goethe passed his time with in Wetzlar is unclear, but he probably didn't work as a legal clerk; Kestner was therefore not his superior, and Jerusalem didn't shoot himself in front of Goethe. There, I said it.Personally, I thought two points of the movie were icky: I didn't buy that Charlotte and Goethe would have bumped uglies immediately after their first kiss (and especially not in the middle of the falling rain), and I thought the scene, when a despondent Goethe arrives in Frankfurt only to find out that Charlotte secretly had his novel published and that it turned out to be a smash hit bestseller (yadda yadda yadda), was extremely cheesy.Where the movie excels is to take us into a time that was, by modern standards, very damp, dark and filthy, but also wildly romantic.