World War Dead: Rise of the Fallen
World War Dead: Rise of the Fallen
| 04 May 2015 (USA)
World War Dead: Rise of the Fallen Trailers

To celebrate the centenary of WW1, a TV Documentary team travels to the Somme to put together a ratings smash about new mysteries relating to the famous battle. However, what they unearth is far from a new story of those that died 100 years ago – but an army of the undead and a brand new war.

Reviews
Michael Ledo

"World War Dead - Rise Of The Fallen" and "Clash of the Dead" are the same film. This is a found footage zombie film. A documentary crew with internal conflict are filming at Somme and talking about the battle with Dr. Brian Locke (Robert Bladen) an egotist expert. The discussion wanders off to a curse of the undead and an amulet found on an Rhodesian soldier. The next thing you know, zombies, which were not as well made up as the picture on the cover. We have the run at night cam, ground cam, and screaming while jerky the camera scare.The film started out as it might be interesting, but the actors were not convincing and the dialogue fell a little short. What I didn't understand was how the mining helmet lights still worked after 100 years. I want one of those batteries.Guide: F-word. No sex or nudity

... View More
FountainPen

How many "movies" such as this have been produced and put on the market? As I work my way through several hundred DVDs bought in bulk lots on eBay at bargain-basement prices, I have come across many fine motion pictures, plus a relatively high percentage of abortions such as this crud. It appears to have been made by a group of high school kids who have an idea they are cinematographers. Nope, they aren't, and never will be. The concept for the film is reasonable, but the acting, scripting, direction, and everything else are lousy, painful to watch. On the plus side, the film is shot in focus. I suppose once the group are heavily into production, they figure they've reached the point of no return, so might as well finish it and try to recover some of the money spent on the drivel. Sorry to sound so "sour grapes", but I am. I resent "movies" which are touted as being of value but turn out to be real stinkers. Did I mention moronic dialogue and pitiable characters? Yes, they're included in this movie-going experience. Maybe, if the target audience is pre-teenagers, the flick is well-aimed. NOT RECOMMENDED! Rated 1/10 because IMDb don't permit a zero out of ten. Thank you for reading my complaint. #

... View More
richardhoughton

The person who watched this obviously hates or dislikes found footage horrors as he tore this movie apart. Its not that bad. it was watchable, not the best movie ever but the guy who wrote his review said nothing happens and boring. Things do happen, they have zombies that attack the characters and there is some blood yes. I watched it and didn't mind it, although i have seen worse movies. the tunnels part? the reviewer said its so dark you cannot see? the characters had lights and torches so what is he complaining about? you can see what they are doing?I give this movie a 4.6 out of 10, it was watchable and characters were OK, i liked the lead reporter lady she did a good job at presenting, i may get people saying, this movie was bad, but this is my opinion which everyone is entitled to.worth watching!

... View More
arfdawg-1

The Plot. Yet another found footage movie this time about lost WW2 soldiers who turn out to be zombies.Oh boy.Everything about it stinks. Even the fake camera glitches. It sucks.77 minutes long and it feels like you've been watching for 36 hours.It's formulaic and predictable. It goes on and on and nothing happens.There director's idea of action is having the actors pretend they are out of breath.Midway into this movie they go underground and it's so dark you cant see a thing.OMG, it's so horrible.

... View More