Based on real events this film starts out with Robert Stewart being discovered in his cell after he has murdered his cell mate Zahid Mubarek . The film then traces the events that led up to this murder. In doing so it appears to have drawn heavily on the findings of the inquiry into the events at Feltham Young Offender Institute during the year 2000.Stewart is played by Leeshon Alexander who also wrote this and he puts in a very commendable performance. The back story includes unvarnished criticisms of the Prison Service too and an attempt to understand why he did this terrible and unprovoked act.In terms of presentation this is a very 'staged' performance with few locations and obvious sets, but this is done for artistic impact and I felt actually worked really well. This is not an easy watch though as the material being covered is one that is alien to most people; it is though a very worthwhile piece of movie making that will appeal to those who like real life dramas and don't mind starting with the ending – especially one that is essentially an unhappy one.

8.5 of 10. The joy of a good monster film, including flaunting seemingly bad grammar at critics, but without having to suspend disbelief. This fact-based film gets you inside of a very different, and very real, Hannibal Lecter that is too pure to eat others but no less psychotic.For the filmmakers, opting to attempt to recreate the story and character rather than do a documentary, the challenge is how to create thrills, suspense, and mystery for relatively recent history. They opt to focus on the "monster" man along, to a lesser extent, his enablers and the odd youth/minors prison atmosphere of the UK.There are a few choices that make the film less interesting than it could be. For example, the monster's earlier history is relived through non-linear memories, making it hard for those unfamiliar with the person and what happened, those who are the main target of the film, to piece together the context or the horror and injustice of what happened. The writer and director needed to assume more ignorance and lack of interest in the audience.Nonetheless, you'll never look at someone talking to themselves again quite the same and it's far more entertaining than watching someone dump a bucket of their own urine over their head on a Web video, though equally disgusting.

Just another morning at Feltham Young Offenders at day break . A officer does his rounds but upon looking in to a cell he finds young offender Robert Stewart has murdered his cellmate Zahid Mubarek . This film tells of the events that led up to the murder Based on a true story of a senseless murder my IMDb peer EuroGary suggests the film should have tried a bit harder . I've got to disagree because despite having a flaw which I will get to in a moment this isn't a film that's chosen any easy routes to tell a story . The easy option would have been for the production team doing a docudrama type of movie . Considering there's very little budget available and has a mainly static setting director Antony Petrou and screenwriter Leeshon Alexander have used a lot of imagination in telling much of the story in a surreal expressionistic style where much of the exposition takes place via Stewart as a literal split personality and as a film projection suddenly appearing on a wall . Add to all this a striking musical soundtrack by Fred Portelli that is assuredly unsettling and you've got a film that lives up to the tagline of psychological horror which creeps under your skin and stays there As good as all this is there is a fly in the ointment and that is not only does Leeshon Alexander write the screenplay but also stars in the role as Robert Stewart . Now I'm sure Mr Alexander is a good guy in real life and it probably shows on screen . Take a look at the real life Robert Stewart and the blood instantly chills and that alone should deter any youngster from committing the smallest misdemeanor . Being an actor no doubt meant that Alexander's performance is the dominating central element of WE ARE MONSTER and while this would have worked on the stage in a dynamic way it's rather negated in what is effectively an expressionistic horror movie . Sadly even here Alexander's performance isn't really strong enough to carry the film in the way the actor/writer envisaged . I found the "taunting alter-ego Stewart" just a little too self conscious and mannered to be absolutely disturbing and was often aware that I was watching an actor play a racist psycho rather than a real life monster . This is a pity you can see what the film is trying to do but doesn't do it in an entirely successful way

This is based on the case of Robert Stewart, a racist who, incarcerated in Feltham Young Offenders Institute, murdered his Asian cellmate, Zahid Mubarek. The film seeks to tell some of Stewart's back-story, as well as expose the failings at Feltham itself.Lead actor, the unusually-named 'Leeshon' Alexander, also wrote the script. And there's the problem: as an actor, he makes a fair writer; as a writer, he makes a fair actor. Most of the film has Stewart imagining he's talking to a slightly more exciting version of himself (also played by Alexander). The constant swearing and racial epithets these conversations consist of become wearing with nothing lighter to enliven the piece; even a shot of the impressively-muscled Alexander in the shower (waist upwards only I'm afraid) has to be accompanied by his 'other self' moaning about how he acquired a tattoo of Bob Marley on his arm. Secondary characters - even the victim himself, Mubarek - are barely more than sketched out; the prison guards are shown as exclusively lazy, racist, or both. As for the acting, Alexander relies too much on wide-eyed stares to convey an unhinged mind. (And, to be honest, he's rather swarthy to be convincing as a white racist - possibly that's why the entire film is shot in a strange, washed-out, unrealistic light.)The bigwig at the 2014 Edinburgh International Film Festival who introduced the film used film snob language like 'raw' and 'uncompromising'. Perhaps. But my verdict is it's a worthwhile effort, but try harder next time. Doing a socially-conscious campaigning piece is all very well, but you've got to throw the audience a bone of interest every now and again.