Some hobbies just seem to attract completists. Here is one man's story about the consequences of obsession. Alan Zweig is a long time record collector, to the point that he has sacrificed other goals to make room for his hobby. The most notable of these compromises is his admission that he feels that the fact that he doesn't have a wife or kids is related to his collecting.I've collected different things all my life, so I felt like I could relate to some degree. The movie made me think about the nature of collecting things. Do we do it to fill a void in our lives? Alan makes some very good, very true points about how the mind of the collector works and where it can take you. He tells one story about getting rid of a particular record that he thought he was ready to part with, but has since regretted nearly every day. This is what you go through when you let your interests have too much influence in your life.Some of the different things I've collected: Star Wars, G.I. Joe, and Transformers action figures (preschool years); comic books (middle school years); records (high school and college); and downloading Mp3's and Disney collector pins (adulthood). I would also put movies in this category, even though I don't collect them in the traditional sense of buying them and keeping a stack of dvds. Watching them and writing IMDb reviews is along the same lines as what I used to do when I would get a new record or comic, digest it, and then fit it into a system of organization.Each time I have been a serious collector, I decided at some point to get rid of the majority of my collection and only keep what was really special. I was then able to move on to other things. Apparently, the hardcore collectors in this doc have never gone through that "flushing out" process. Also, I have never allowed my hobbies to become so all-consuming that they kept me from other goals, such as getting a degree or getting married. So I guess I have not experienced the depth of obsession that some of the collectors in this movie have lived through. But that doesn't mean I haven't been close. Thank goodness I don't have any regrets as deep as what Alan expresses. But I do wish I had used my time better and prepared more for the future. Seeing a little bit of myself in this sad story helps remind me I have to keep focused on what is really important.

Alan blows a lot of time on this film lamenting that he wishes he'd spent his life being a family man rather than being some guy on his own buying a lot of records. I don't want to judge too harshly, but it seems to me that a possible reason the guy has lucked out is he is both whiny and domineering judging from the way he conducts interviews, he doesn't seem to like other people in his life talking much or getting too much attention, again going by his interviewing style and how the film is edited.The collectors interviewed all seem charming, relatively happy and very quirky to me and some had cool anecdotes. I would have enjoyed this film far more if that's what comprised the whole film, rather than the 'I'm in a hobby that's for freaks/ help me I think I have OCD/ what have I done with my life' ramblings. Also the scene where Alan tries to scam on a female collector by trying to seduce her with an elevator muzak version of Over the Rainbow is as others have pointed out, very creepy.Daniel Richler and Don McKellar look like they have great collections, it would be great if they were in the film for more than 30 seconds each.

Why do people always tell you what they wish a film had been or what they would have done or what there should have been more of or less of? "There should have been more audiophiles". "There should have been less of the filmmaker". "It would have been better if my uncle was in it". etc etc blah blah blah. Me and my friends love this movie and we rent it whenever we can find it. I think the reason some people don't get it is because they want it to be ONLY about record collecting and while it is about that, it's about a lot more too. I'm not a record collector myself, although some of my friends are and I wouldn't have wanted it to be some celebration of record collecting. If you want a movie about audiophiles, make it yourself. Skimming through the reviews on IMDb, it seems like the most vocal reviewers are usually the ones who have the most complaints. And sometimes those complaints are entertaining but it shouldn't give you the wrong impression of this very unique and very cool flick. Oh and by the way, one of my friends told me that reviewer "Ivan Haffenden" is actually in the movie and so his comments should be ignored more than most.

I really enjoyed Ivan Haffenden's portrayal of Zack X. McBuick MCMLIX--and found his performance as strong, nay, stronger, than that of James Coburn playing Britt in The Magnificent Seven (1960). Take the following line, for example: "Nobody throws my mint copy of Like Long Hair by Paul Revere & the Raiders at me and says it originally came out on Jerden. Nobody." The tension is palpable.The discussions of the relative merits of analog versus digital provided new insight into the rich and complex world of mindless polemic.Also worthy of note were the many antique cars and musical instruments that dotted this cinematic landscape. I was especially taken by the 1965 Studebaker Lark (the built-in vanity kit was an innovative feature!) and what appeared to be a Mellotron MkII of similar vintage.Overall, I give this picture high marks both for content and neat stuff.