It is a good idea to see this film only you are fan of Diego Luna or Jon Bon Jovi. not because it is a bad film ( it really is ) but because the script, the director and the performances are absent. the story is too well known. the cliches are the same, the end is familiar, the love / revenge stories are not different. and , like in many other cases, the though after final credits is the same - it could be better.

I'll admit that Bon Jovi isn't my first choice when I think of "actors" to play vampire hunters but somehow his presence in this film works. Essentially, VAMPIRES: LOS MUERTOS is a retelling of John Carpenter's 1997 film VAMPIRES, featuring a vampire killer who gets together a team of fighters to go up against the undead menace. As the title would suggest, this sequel travels south of the border to engage in some Day of the Dead shenanigans and vampire action slightly influenced by the likes of FROM DUSK TILL DAWN.I'll admit that I'm not a fan of Carpenter's original film, whose '90s-era excesses have dated very badly. This one's a definite step up from that, although it's still no great shakes. The story is so simple a child could have written it, just going back and forth between humans killing vampires and vampires killing humans. There's absolutely no depth, and not even any twists to enliven things.On the plus side, the characters are drawn a little better than usual, and there are opportunities for the supporting cast members to get a look in (including a youthful Diego Luna, later to turn heartthrob in DIRTY DANCING: HAVANA NIGHTS). Bon Jovi, as ageless as ever, betrays his lack of training as an actor but isn't required to do much other than look cool and determined.The vampires are a clichéd menace and the chief villain is pitiful. At least there's some gore to keep horror fans happy. More interestingly, the director has been well chosen: Tommy Lee Wallace, who once made HALLOWEEN III: SEASON OF THE WITCH and IT, has a long association with the genre and gives this film a certain style it would otherwise have lacked.

Vampires: Los Muertos starts as Vampire hunter Derek Bliss (Jon Bon Jovi) is hired by a mysterious client to recruit a team of Vampire hunters & travel to a small town in Mexico to wipe out a nest of Vampires situated there, however it seems that someone is one step ahead of him as all of his potential team of hunters are being killed off. Derek becomes suspicious & eventually assembles his own team of a half human half Vampire woman named Zoey (Natasha Wagner), a Mexican kid named Sancho (Diego Luna) & a Catholic Priest Father Rodrigo (Cristián de la Fuente) who brotherhood has been killed by the master Vampire. Derek learns that the Master Vampire Una (Arly Jover) is trying to find the anti-crucifix & perform a ceremony that will allow her to walk in daylight...Written & directed by Tommy Lee Wallace this was the first sequel to John Carpenter's rather good horror film Vampires (1998) who already has previous when it comes to horror film sequels having helmed the criminally underrated Halloween III: Season of the Witch (1982) & the fun Fright Night Part 2 (1988), while not as good as the original Vampires or featuring any of the original character's or even referring to the original events this sequel isn't that bad as far as follow ups go although I doubt I'd want to ever watch it again. The script feels a little routine, ideas & themes are taken from other better films such as the Mexican setting already seen in From Dusk Till Dawn (1996) & the anti-crucifix aspect is ripped directed from the original Vampires. The script takes itself very seriously & plods along in unspectacular fashion, there are these people who talk about killing Vampires, drive for a bit, kill a few Vampires & then talk about killing Vampires some more in a rather underwhelming manner that gets repetitive. At 90 odd minutes long the pace is alright even if there isn't enough story to fill that time out, the character's are all dull & no-one comes across as particularly likable or interesting with the Master vampire Una only speaking a few lines of dialogue during the entire film. There are a few decent moments, there's nothing amazingly bad about Vampires: Los Muertos either & it passed the time harmlessly enough but I doubt I'll remember anything about it by the end of the week.Shot in full 2:35:1 widescreen the film looks nice enough with strong Earthy colours & nice enough locations & sets but again nothing stands out that much, sure it's competent & while it's on screen it's find but once the end credits roll you will probably forget all about it. There's some alright gore here & luckily I didn't notice any CGI computer effects, a bartender has his head punched off & his stump spurts blood over a pool table, there are slit throats, a fair amount of blood splatter, burning Vampires, decapitated heads & several stakings as well. Set mainly in the daytime at least you can see what's going on, there's none of that shaky hand-held camera crap either which is appreciated.Actually filmed in Mexico the production values are nice & it looks like Vampires: Los Muertos had some money spent on it. The acting is alright, the obvious thing of note is the casting of rocker Jon Bon Jovi as the lead Vampire hunter who to be fair does OK, Natasha Wagner is poor while Arly Jover plays another Vampire after appearing in the original Blade (1998) as Mercury.Vampires: Los Muertos is passable horror sequel fare that is neither particularly great nor particularly bad, it's just sort of middle of the road entertainment that you can watch & use to pass the time but will have forgotten about by the time the end credits finish rolling. Not as good as the original Vampires but maybe worth catching if you were a fan of it, followed by a further sequel Vampires: The Turning (2005).

My personal opinion is that this movie had no real story line to the first john carpenter's vampires but i don't care I LOVED IT. Jon Bon Jovi (Derek) was great in this movie. He really mad me believe that he was the person you would never think he was a famous ROCKSTAR. There were some bad things about this movie. Like the story line,there should have been more to the movie.there should have been a sequel to the movie that followed the movies story line and they should have kept the same main characters in all three vampires movies. i really liked the clothes that the people wore and the setting they pick in Mexico. i liked how it was old Mexico and not new Mexico. with the clay houses and the old fashion churches. i was a little confused with the vampires and how they were able to walk in churches but it was cool how they didn't follow Dracula vampire rules.