In Las Vegas, the powerful three hundred year old vampire Sylvian (Toni Todd) hires Dr. van Helm (Delia Sheppard) to research a cure to survive in the sun. She uses three vampire women as guinea pigs to test the serum in the desert and a couple that is camping witnesses the failure and calls the police. Detective Stanton (Ted Monte) and his partner Detective O'Hara (Gigi Erneta) are assigned to investigate the case. Meanwhile, Jason (Edward Spivak), who is going to marry Rachel (Sonya Joy Sims), and two friends travel to Las Vegas for his bachelor party with a couple of strippers, but the women are actually vampires that attack them. Out of the blue, Rachel and her friend Nikki (Brandin Rackley) decide to travel to Las Vegas to surprise her boyfriends. The group is captured by Sylvian that uses them to feed the pack vampires and test the new research."Vampire in Vegas" is one of the worst vampire movies I have ever seen. The story is silly and the acting is so bad that becomes hilarious. Toni Todd lures the viewers working in this awful movie. Fortunately most of the "actors" and "actresses" are young and have time to make a reflection and chose another profession and business to survive. In the end, this movie that happens in Vegas, should have stayed in Vegas, preferably buried or burnt. My vote is three.Title (Brazil): "Vampiro em Vegas" ("Vampire in Vegas")

This must be the worst movie this year, 2009, but what had I really expected from a director like Jim Wynorski? Take only The Pandora Project [ 1998 ] as a deterrent example.That producers give Jim Wynorski money to direct films is for me a mystery. But what can you expect from producers as Bryan Sexton and Julie K. Smith?Isn't Julie K. Smith a former scream queen, slash soft porn star? Now crap movie producer?In the epilogue you can see a lot of interesting facts, that the associate producer Steve Goldenberg also are Best Boy and Rigging Gaffer, and that associate producer Rob Sanchez, who played the Security Guard number 2, also work as the movie sets gaffer.Who payed for this?

Tony Todd stars in a film that had to be done film for cash. Its an odd mix of horror comedy and enhanced cleavage as various dark forces battle it out in Vegas. Forgive me if I don't go into the plot, I don't think the filmmakers ever had a clear idea what that was to begin with. That said the film is a mess with a great deal happening but none of it making sense. The film seems to be on the level of a bad adult film's exposition scenes. You know the ones where no one takes it seriously since its only suppose to move you to the next sex scenes. There's little sex in this film, none of it erotic, though all of the women are well endowed and shot to show off their assets to maximum effect. Todd is the only one who gives anything remotely like a performance and he seems to be embarrassed to even be associated with this film. I'm embarrassed to say I've seen it, so don't make the same mistake.

It's like watching a porn movie without the sex scenes. It has been a while since I've seen a (horror)movie that was this bad! This really has no redeeming qualities, the story is awful, just like the actors, the visual effects, etc, etc. Tony Todd is not in his Candyman mood, here he is just plain bad. All the other actors are even worse, all of them people I've never heard of (and probably won't in the future if this is a reference...). The story is something we've seen many times before (and much better), It's you typical 'Vampire wants to find a cure to be able to survive daylight'-type of films. You are better of watching 'Zombie Strippers' than this piece of garbage! A.A.A.C. (avoid at all costs).