Tobruk
Tobruk
| 07 February 1967 (USA)
Tobruk Trailers

In September 1942, the German Afrika Korps under Rommel have successfully pushed the Allies back into Egypt. A counter-attack is planned, for which the fuel dumps at Tobruk are a critical impediment. In order to aid the attack, a group of British commandos and German Jews make their way undercover through 800 miles of desert, to destroy the fuel dumps starving the Germans of fuel.

Reviews
Wuchak

RELEASED IN 1967 and directed Arthur Hiller, "Tobruk" chronicles events during WWII in Northern Africa when a Canadian major (Rock Hudson) teams-up with British commandos & German Jews to hinder Rommel's Afrika Korps by destroying his major fuel depot in Tobruk, Libya. Nigel Green plays the British colonel while George Peppard appears as the Jewish captain with Guy Stockwell as his subordinate. Jack Watson and Percy Herbert are also on hand.The movie scores high marks with the notable cast, grave ambiance and brutal action, but it's also hindered by hackneyed contrivances, like the eye-rolling trap door and traitor element. But any flaws are redeemed by a literally explosive climax. There's also some commendable human interest and tension in the ethnic prejudice department.THE FILM RUNS 107 minutes and was shot in Arizona (Yuma, Tucson & Mojave Desert) and Imperial County, California. WRITER: Leo Gordon.GRADE: B-

... View More
Daniel Britten

The interplay between the 3 groups of allied soldiers, the stiff upper lipped British colonel,the independent Canadian major (Hudson) and the German Jews is interesting, if bordering on slightly racist at times. But then that's the point. Political correctness would prevent such a point being made nowadays, but it brings out the fact that the so-called allies were often allied in name only, and the fact that anti-semitism was more widespread than people realize. The fraught relationship between Green and Hudson adds an extra frisson, and is very reminiscent of that between William Holden and Jack Hawkins in Bridge on the River Quai.Pity all of this had to take second place at the end to lots of standard WW2 heroics and blowing up. One more thing - it's not Dean Stockwell. It's Guy, his lesser-known brother.

... View More
verbusen

Having never even heard of this film at the age of 44 and an avid war film buff, I really thought it would suck. Throw in Rock Hudson and well, that didn't raise my expectations. I was scared to read the other reviews here as well thinking it would reflect the low 6 average rating on IMDb. Well, I just finished watching this 60's war actioner and here is my praise, I was very pleasantly surprised! The beginning was nothing too hot but I started to take notice when Brit traitors are picked up, this was Ice Station Zebra stuff, which I though was just great. Not that having Brit's against Germans, and German Jews being used by the Brit's and throw in the Italians as well, well now we have Brit spies and German double agents! I mean thats what can make a straight actioner like this pretty interesting (Where Eagles Dare?). What really sells it for me, if you want to watch a fiction war movie and really enjoy it, it needs LOTS of destruction, preferably by Commando's! Well in the end this one really delivers. I love the flame thrower scenes, the audio to that flamethrower was a great touch! I don't think I ever remember hearing it like that before. BTW if a war flick uses flame throwers I tend to remember them above ones that just use guns, so kudo's to the director for realizing that fact! Other flame thrower war movies I vividly remember, Hell Is For Hero's (James Coburn gets fried wearing one, very shocking the first time you watch it), When Trumpets Fade (that flame thrower scene was very shocking), and Men In War (Robert Ryan charging a hill with Aldo Ray wearing a flame thrower? C'Mon that is war movie heaven), oh yeah who could forget The Deer Hunter (DeNero in Nam blazing away, c'mon), I even think Rambo had one in part 2 (my favorite fictional war action movie ever). Here we have George Peppard blazing away a whole lot of Germans and it's done up close and personal, very nice scenes, I was impressed. Of course it has the post WW2 era American tanks and all, but like another reviewer said, it also had a P-40 so they tried a little bit. I think hardly any of the 50's to 70's war films were very accurate when it came to military hardware like tanks, budget was probably the reason, or maybe no one thought anyone would notice?, lol. If that's your biggest complaint against this film you are not going to enjoy a lot of war films from these years (thats actually why I enjoyed the Battle Of El Alemein, they tried to show authentic crappy Italian tanks in battle, even though the Brits were using personnel carriers as tanks and the German tanks were models, lol at least they tried a little!). The military hardware thing is just something you eventually (after 20 + years of watching these films) tend to overlook so you can enjoy the film. Hudson doesn't let me down and the Brits involved are all established war film character actors adding to a great realism that this is an above average war flick. I give it a solid 8 as far as fiction war films go. If You Liked The Rat Patrol and Ice Station Zebra.......with a touch of Guns Of Navarone, give it a view. Bravo!

... View More
mm-39

After an unpleasant birthday party for my future father in law, my girl friend and I went to my house to watch tv. On A&E they had this interesting WW 2 movie. I do not know how realistic it is, but it sure has an entertaining story. Undercover German Jews, British special forces, and a mole have too execute a black bag operation. Pretty cool, to watch George Peppard run around with a flame thrower. Not the usually sloppy acting for a 60's ww 2 movie. 7/10

... View More