Ha hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaBut seriously not even bad funny ... I laughed at first for maybe 10mins ... then I just sat aghast ..... maybe watch this if you want to see how bad a movie can be ..

Does some of these critics actively just want to see their reviews as decent reviews, it wasn't typical run of the mill adventure, , didn't anyone just enjoy the ENTERTAINMENT ffs, instead of picking up every tiny flaw they could nibble at all day and night long

**** May contain strong spoilers ****This is a review made by StoneDraim... and that means that if you want to read a probably different kind of review, keep reading....This is my personal experience, my personal point of view/perspective and my personal opinion... and my opinion is just one of like 7 billions in this world.First off, I thought the whole concept and the movie itself of Titanic 2 was a joke. Like a "trailer joke". Then I heard that there really is a movie called Titanic 2. After that.... I heard some things about this movie and looked it up on IMDb... and....well.... 1.8 says a lot. Anyway; to get more understanding and appreciation of really good productions and a total quality of a motion picture, I went on and watched it.The ONLY thing that is of near approved quality in this one is Bruce Davison. How he accepted this production is a enormous enigma. Sad.Take the adult industry and how the production use to be. This is in many cases even worse. If you are a serious movie viewer, see this one as education. Otherwise; you have been warned.Over to the movie as a product: - The production : Awful balance of picture and music. Music itself low budget overall, and... well....bad. The animations and special effects; the concepts of animations and special effects should be ashamed to allow this kind of amateur work. Movie recording quality is similar from an 1980 poor example of an adult production. - The actors : Actors...? Where....? (Bruce Davison is maybe the exception.) Bad boy, Shane Van Dyke, bad boy! - The story : Did anyone give it a real reflection on how reprehensible the small adjustment from the storyline of "Titanic" this is...? Well...?! ....exactly....so I thought. - Entertainment : Entertainment. Yes. I want that too. - Age : 112,0 out of 10. (The final rate is based most on my own entertainment of the movie. Short elucidation of the rating: 4 Failed. Lacking in character. 3 Bad. Weak. Foul. 2 Amateur, small-time, bad... and misconduct. 1 Poor. Lousy. There should be proper laws against this. Press delete. 0 Ignoble... and jail time should be served.)

This movie makes me sick and especially how someone actually named this movie Titanic 2. If they wanted to make a movie, there's no point copying the classic because this piece of crap could never beat any movie. After they discovered that a tsunami was going to hit the ice burg I just shut it off and I wasn't even going bother about the ending. The movie was a waste and so unprofessional. I downloaded this movie from the internet and thank goodness my internet is unlimited because I deleted it. You know what? After I had written this review I don't even want to hear about this stupid-pathetic-waste-of-time-unoriginal-crappy movie again in my life. The thought of it is just way too embarrassing. Even if I got paid 10x more than Kate Winslet and Leonardo Dicaprio did in 1997 I wouldn't give less of a s**t. I would never act in this movie. The actors must of been homeless or something. I do not recommend this at all. Keep watching the original one. Your time will be used a lot more wisely.