Yes, it's the old "same event told from various different perspectives" device, this time updated to an urban, excessively profane, and fairly low-budget version. It is quite ambitious and daring for a first-time writer-director (A.J. Kparr) to tackle this concept, however the film is spoiled by amateurish acting in some of the supporting parts (especially a bouncer-like guy who has pretty poor diction and is hard to understand at times), and by Kparr's own insistence to add twist upon twist upon twist to the point where nothing hangs together anymore. Still, I watched "The Box" twice without being bored, and I would be interested to see Kparr's next project. ** out of 4.P.S. They tried to downplay Gabrielle Union's beauty for this "serious" role, but it didn't quite work: she is still amazingly beautiful.

A friend of mine saw this at the San Diego Film Festival and told me about it and that Giancarlo Esposito was in it (a very underrated talent). For Esposito alone, I picked it up and I was quite pleased. I like what the first time helmer Kparr did with a relatively unknown cast, except for Esposito and Gabrielle Union (who I was extremely surprised, but I'll speak on her later). The story was a solid crime, thriller. I know hardcore film geeks, who live to pick stuff apart will try to find flaws, but hell American Gangster had flaws, with two Oscar winners in front the camera and another who scribed that "celluloid gold". But back to "The Box". Being that this flick was working with a handful of sets, I dug the look. And as far as performances, the guy playing Kamen and the guy playing Danny were standouts (I want to see more of them), Esposito (always on point) and Yul Vasquez was good, the guy playing Tommy kind of phoned it in, but the biggest surprise for me was Gabrielle Union. The director made a daring bit of casting with Gabrielle Union as a tough as nails policeman. I know her as the spunky cheerleader or the sexy siren that Morris Chestnut or Taye Diggs is running after in a flick, but this role I'd never see her playing, but she rocked it. Actors have defining roles in their careers and right now in her somewhat young career this is it. I give this director much credit for getting that performance and writing a solid story. I want to see has next in store.

only very slight spoiler (if you could even call it that) Many versions of the same robery from witness accounts or police summaries, many do not make any sense what so ever, the premise is good, but if you can apply rational to the storyline you are given, the holes become like a cartoon cheese. once they have done with the ridiculous possibilities then they start adding the twists, and you start asking yourself, well if they already knew that guy then how come yada yada yada... this goes on through the entire second half and the entire film gets ruined, why is it American films just cannot "do" twists, they either give that many clues you'd have to be blind deaf and dumb not to see it coming, or in the case of this film, make them so absured they stretch the boundaries of logic. by the end of the film its a surprise that everybody wasn't on first name terms and schooled together. ridiculous describes the story..

This movie is so full of twists. Every ten minutes it seems there is a new story about how the event happened. One thing I did like is the way the movie got it's title was explained near the end so that was one thing I didn't have to wonder about. The actors were OK but the direction was just average. At the end I am still am confused. Oh You know where all the characters fit into the story but the ending failed to tie all the strings together. It was a movie that ended just before the story was over. It seems today several movies have ended that way. It's almost as if they are planning for a second part in another movie. I can say this much about the plot. Like so many dramas the motive is greed and you won't see who's greed it was, coming. One viewing was enough, twice would be way to much.