This is the third Silly Symphony, and the first dedicated to the seasons (the others being Summer, Autumn, Winter).In Springtime there are some animals and flowers that dance celebrating the spring, but then a storm arrives. After the rain, near a pond, they all dance to the Dance of the Hours.In this short animals have a starring role; two ladybirds, a caterpillar, a crow's family, two cute grasshoppers, some turtles used as drums, a spider that uses his web like an harp, some dancing frogs and a stork. But there are also, at the beginning, few trees and some dancing flowers, and a tree that washes himself with the pouring rain.The strange thing of this short is that every creature dies after his performance; the caterpillar is eaten by the raven, the grasshoppers swallowed by the frog, the frogs are the stork's lunch, and in the end, the stork is swallowed by a giant puddle.In the end it's a nice short, and it's a must-see for all animal lovers. Featuring Grieg's ''Morning Mood'' and Ponchielli's ''Dance of the Hours''

Oh my I am gonna come off as such a crabcake in this review, because I'm afraid that this short really doesn't work for me at all. It's not very fun, it doesn't have any real charm that I could see, and I know it was only the third ever Silly Symphony to be put out and it was all still very much a work in progress as far as the quality and very art of the animation was concerned, but the sound is just awful. As the creatures dance around there is so much tinny klop klop klopping noise that just to me sounded horribly cheap and brutal, like someone is tapping a pan with a teaspoon, it just doesn't sound good at all. I also don't like the more weird unnatural touches like when the caterpillar separates its body segments and the stretchy limbs of the bird, that kinda thing is much more Fleischer than Disney. And I know it was perfectly mild but I really didn't like the animals eating each other, and it wasn't like they all come back alive and well at the end either. I mean I get that in their own way the animators were probably trying to show what really happens in nature from the animals that they doubtlessly observed, but I didn't like that! Thank goodness it didn't become a regular thing! I didn't mean for this to be so negative but I'm only being honest. In fact I've been getting back into these shorts a lot lately, but this is as poor a short as I remembered it, I'd rank it among the series' worst. Most of what is in it was later done again more effectively in later Symphonies like "Flowers and Trees", and even the 1930 "Summer" short. And much like Summer it feels more like a depiction of the animal life of a swamp environment than anything to do with Spring, apart from the opening flowers and hatching chicks at the beginning. It's not even remotely a good tribute to the first season. So to me at least the third time is not always the charm. Oh well, it's still a part of the rich evolving tapestry of a series that had far greater animated wonders yet to come... Not their best!

Back in the early days of Disney Studios, the company made a huge number of so-called 'Silly Symphonies'. These cartoon shorts did not feature the usual Disney characters like Mickey or Donald but were musical shorts featuring lots of new and not so cuddly characters. A few were actually quite dark--such as skeletons, demons and in the case of "Springtime" animals that spend a lot of the film eating each other--and not in a cute way! The film is a musical that shows animals cavorting about in the springtime--but this fun is interrupted when some frogs eat each other and then they are eaten by a bird--only to be regurgitated! Pretty weird stuff and clearly the sort of time many would be surprised today to see when they hear that it came from the same people that brought us Goofy and Bambi! Worth seeing if you are an early animation nut.

A Walt Disney SILLY SYMPHONY Cartoon Short.It is SPRINGTIME at the marsh, and the joy of the season is causing the various birds & bugs to dance about rapturously and eat each other up...This black & white cartoon is basically an exercise in action/reaction animation. The Disney artists seem to have an unending supply of posterior gags, often rather vulgar. The tuneful soundtrack with its familiar themes pushes the action along - most notably Ponchielli's `Dance of the Hours,' which would be showcased to great effect eleven years later in the Studio's FANTASIA.The SILLY SYMPHONIES, which Walt Disney produced for a ten year period beginning in 1929, are among the most interesting of series in the field of animation. Unlike the Mickey Mouse cartoons in which action was paramount, with the Symphonies the action was made to fit the music. There was little plot in the early Symphonies, which featured lively inanimate objects and anthropomorphic plants & animals, all moving frantically to the soundtrack. Gradually, however, the Symphonies became the school where Walt's animators learned to work with color and began to experiment with plot, characterization & photographic special effects. The pages of Fable & Fairy Tale, Myth & Mother Goose were all mined to provide story lines and even Hollywood's musicals & celebrities were effectively spoofed. It was from this rich soil that Disney's feature-length animation was to spring. In 1939, with SNOW WHITE successfully behind him and PINOCCHIO & FANTASIA on the near horizon, Walt phased out the SILLY SYMPHONIES; they had run their course & served their purpose.