Shoot
Shoot
R | 28 May 1976 (USA)
Shoot Trailers

When boredom, pride and a mad second of misjudgement leaves a hunter shot dead by one of five combat veterans also hunting in the Canadian hills, it is expected a police investigation will follow, but when the veterans discover the incident has not been reported, the leader of the team, Major Rex suspects the other party maybe plotting revenge. Convinced that he, his party, and their families will be targets themselves he decides to beat his suspected assailants at their own game, grouping together more army comrades and stocking up an arsenal of weapons for the forthcoming battle.

Reviews
merklekranz

With Cliff Robertson, Ernest Borgnine, and Henry Silva on board, I was expecting a lot more than "Shoot" delivered. Character development is virtually nil, and Silva's part could easily been played by a no name actor. Sandwitched between the opening ambush and the final shootout in the snow, is some filler that has no bearing whatsoever on the outcome of the movie. A chatty widow and a friend's wife throwing themselves at Cliff Robertson feels like nothing more than script stretching. "Shoot"'s similarity to "Rituals" and "Hunter's Blood", two other "Deliverance" clones is unmistakable, but they are far superior movies. A BIG letdown. - MERK

... View More
HumanoidOfFlesh

A group of war veterans led by Cliff Robertson are ambushed while hunting in the Canadian hills and return fire.Suspecting a future retaliation they gather together more army comrades,stock an arsenal of weapons and head back to the hills for a final shoot-out."Shoot" is a Canadian survivalist drama with Cliff Robertson,Henry Silva and Ernest Borgnine.The film can be easily compared to "Deliverance" and "Southern Comfort".I must admit that the first and the final shoot-outs are very intense and violent,unfortunately the middle section of the film is too talky and suitably dull.The message of "Shoot" is pretty clear:an easy access to weaponry can turn peaceful hunting trip into war zone.7 out of 10.

... View More
Jonathon Dabell

Cliff Robertson was involved in some pretty decent movies in 1976 – "Midway", "Obsession" and the TV movie "Return To Earth" spring to mind. The same cannot be said for Ernest Borgnine for whom 1976 was an 'annus horriblis' in terms of film work. Not only did Borgnine find himself in the dire Italian sex film "Natale In Casa D'Appuntamento", he also co-starred with Robertson in one of the very worst films of the year – the utterly wretched anti-gun thriller "Shoot". You will have to look far and wide for a more boring, obvious, unappealing and morally muddled film than this Canadian offering from director Harvey Hart. It doesn't even fall into the so-bad-it's-good-on-a-curiosity-level category.By day, Rex Jeanette (Cliff Robertson) runs a successful furniture business, but he really lives for evenings and weekends when he and his buddies run an army club and go deer hunting in the nearby forests. One weekend, four of the regular deer hunters travel up to Rex's woodland lodge for a Saturday shooting expedition. Besides Rex himself, there are his pals Lou (Ernest Borgnine), Zeke (Henry Silva) and Pete (James Blendick). Whilst out in the forest they encounter another group of hunters, but for no obvious reason the other group open fire on them and Zeke shoots back, killing one of the opposite group's guys. In panic, Rex's group return home and contemplate their next move – Lou wants to report the incident to the cops, but Zeke is worried that he might be jailed for killing a man, and Rex himself thinks the other group won't report the incident because it was them who shot first. As the week progresses it becomes clear that Rex is right – when the story of the hunter's death finally appears in the newspapers, it turns out that his friends have fabricated a story about how he was killed by an accidental stray bullet. Rex realises that the other group want to have revenge their own way, and figures that the two sides are expected to revisit the site of their earlier encounter to shoot it out. Strangely excited at the prospect, Rex recruits extra men and gathers extra ammunition for the second shoot-out, almost turning the whole affair into a weekend military war game. But when the confrontation finally comes, which side will be most prepared?......For about ten minutes, "Shoot" gives no indication of just how poor it is going to be. The opening sequence in which Rex and his hunting pals run across the other hunting party is put together with enough competence to suggest that a half-decent outdoor thriller might be on the cards. But from there forth, the film is a long-winded bore. We trudge through the whole week leading up to the second shoot-out, watching Rex and his buddies going about their daily lives, meeting up after work to plan their attack. This section of the film goes on and on and on, stumbling from one pointless debate/argument/meeting to another. Watching paint dry is preferable to sticking with the film through this particular segment. When the final shoot-out comes it is over faster than you can blink, and culminates with a pretentious "twist" that has been obvious for the entire length of the film. At any point you might think to yourself: "what if the other group are preparing themselves better? What if they want it more? What if they arm themselves stronger? What if they plan their attack with greater cunning?" If any of those thoughts occur to you, then you're smarter than Rex Jeanette…. and you're infinitely smarter than director Harvey Hart expects you to be!

... View More
inspectors71

As the reviewer Snowleopard points out, the premise for the Canadian film Shoot is a good one, the accidental gunning-down of a hunter by a member of another hunting party, and the subsequent ramping up of a revenge attack on the opposition the next time they're out in the wild. But good ideas sometimes run afoul of sloppy direction and lack of production cash.Shoot sounds good, but looks cheap. Yet, even when you've given up on the movie, when you don't even care anymore that the film has some great talent (Cliff Robertson, Ernest Borgnine, and Henry Silva), you're still rooting for some sort of justice or even just a violent closure to the tragedy that sets the stage for the film.You get the impression that this is just one more of those earlier Canadian films that were thrown together to compete with American products, but didn't have the expertise or the financial backing to pull it off. This isn't an insult to Canada; the skill that Canadian film-makers exhibit is excellent, but skills take practice to acquire and Shoot looks like practice (watch Russian Roulette with George Segal to get a feel for a film industry finding itself).Anyway, as a 19 year old, I was astonished by the ending of the film. Thirty years later, I would probably see it coming a mile away. Unfortunately, I can't find Shoot, but I would suggest that if you can acquire a cheap copy (or even see an edited version on TV), you should do it. The performances are tense and the scenery is stark and beautiful.My recollections are from HBO in 1979 or so, but I do have an affection for this movie. There is a place in Spokane, Washington, under the T.J. Meenach Bridge, on the way to Spokane Falls Community College that will remind you of the river scene in the climax to Shoot. Covered with snow, with icy river water rushing by, you can imagine the climactic shootout in this movie taking place right in front of your eyes.It's a pleasant memory of a mediocre movie.Not a bad thing.

... View More