I am a huge fan of Montgomery.He starred in two of my all time favorite films, Here Comes Mr. Jordan and The Lady in the Lake (which he also directed).Here he both stars and directs but unfortunately that is not enough. Films in border towns turned out to be the kiss of death for adventurous Hollywood producers. Even Charlton Heston tried one (actually playing a Mexican!) and it almost ruined his career.Montgomery has personality, star power, and directing chops to spare. But again, just not enough. The film never gets moving and the faux Mexican overlay (here Wanda Hendrix puts on heavy makeup to play the Mexican love interest) strangles the film in its sleep.An irony Philip Marlowe would appreciate.

This is noir with an unusual racial undercurrent. Ex-soldier Gagin (Montgomery) travels to New Mexico to avenge his combat buddy's murder by blackmailing the war-profiteer (Clark) responsible. Gagin turns out to be not a very nice man. His clipped speech suggests he's being penalized for every word he speaks. Yet, that terseness, direct manner, and unblinking stare also suggest a man who knows his own mind and will not bend easily, a crucial component of the story.We get a first glimpse when he uses that hard manner to make fun of Mexican peasant girl Pila (Hendrix) by calling her Sitting Bull, implying he has neither much knowledge nor respect for the native New Mexico culture. Now, the really nuanced and understated subtext of the movie, apart from the crime drama aspect, is how the tables are subtly turned on him, especially in the final scene where Pila now makes fun of him to her Mexican friends. There's a subtle racial dynamic here that's easily overshadowed by the criminal phase, but is what really distinguishes this noir from others of the classic period.Note, for example, how Gagin's arrogant attitude is subtly turned around, especially by the grubby carousel owner, Pancho. Thomas Gomez's Pancho amounts to an unforgettable character, and one who I think steals the movie amid heavy competition. Pancho is fat and unkempt in ways that Hollywood seldom allowed. But he's also good-natured with a big heart, which probably only the poor with nothing much to lose can be. Pancho will help a stranger and not ask anything in return, an attitude foreign to the grasping Gagin. At first, the easterner doesn't really know what to make of him or his open attitude. Nonetheless, the scene where Pancho shares his outdoor cot with the self-centered Gagin while killers stalk him is not only well played, but crucial to the city boy's growing respect for a different set of values. It's the character Pila, however, that's both unusual and beautifully played. What's behind her immediate hooking onto Gagin. Is it his good looks, his expensive clothes, or maybe something touchier like the challenge of the color line. In fact, the movie plays this sensitive topic expertly. The color-line is never stated, but is implied in a number of ways. Note Gagin's easy familiarity with her right away, bespeaking an unspoken superiority; at the same time, she blurts out haltingly, in her best peasant dress, clearly unsure how to converse with this strange object of attraction.The key scene with the color line, however, is luncheon in the fancy hotel. Note how Pila hesitates while the ever self-assured Gagin strides confidently into the dining-room. Even if she's just visiting for the fiesta, the Mexican girl knows instinctively she's crossing here into forbidden territory. But the really telling part, done so skillfully, is the quick glances between the peasant girl and the smartly dressed hostess who seats them. The eye contacts pass quickly, but speak volumes about social strata in that part of the country. Conversely, note how the gaiety of the Mexican saloon suddenly stops once the white man Gagin steps inside. But unlike Pila's shrinking violet, Montgomery's assured character uses his status to quickly dominate the bar scene. Once again, the subtext is underplayed, but to no less effectHowever, it's that final scene that's stayed with me over the years. Chastened now by the help he's received from Pancho and Pila, Gagin goes to the carousel to say a final good-bye. He's not staying on in San Pablo now that his business with gangster Hugo is finished, implying also that his friendships there can be nothing more than passing ones given the contrasting backgrounds. But notice how hesitant Gagin is in talking to Pila for the last time as she stands boldly among her amigos. Clearly, Gagin's been changed by events and by people he no doubt first considered his inferiors. Now he stammers, no longer glibly self-assured; at the same time, she makes it no easier, staring icily and saying little. She's now clearly the dominant one, embarrassing him in front of the subtly amused government man (Smith). Despite repeated viewings, I still see no hint of her regret at his departure. Instead it looks like she's exulting to her amigos in how she's played him for an apparent chump, which is completely contrary to her behavior throughout. I have no easy explanation for this apparent reversal, except that perhaps she's seeking to re-establish a standing among her peers despite well-concealed inner feelings. But whatever the explanation, this color-line aspect remains, I think, a fascinating one for a movie that refuses the conventional pat ending.Anyway, the movie remains first-rate noir, with top-notch acting, scripting, and directing, especially the memorable touches like Hugo's earphone, the giant puppet, and the musical carousel. Montgomery was clearly a moviemaker with ideas. And here he succeeds in spades.

It's not often that a movie seen once more than 60 years ago lingers, hauntingly, in your memory. Robert Montgomery was a superb actor. His character is really a burnt out case who has seen too much of the hard life and has no compassion left, he thinks. Then he meets up with little Wanda Hendrix, and her plight melts his hard heart and leads to his coming to her aid. The last section of the movie is particularly gripping and atmospheric. It's finally evident where the title comes from. Robert Montgomery was one of our greatest character actors, and here he really lights up the screen in a wonderful performance. Wanda Hendrix is also very effective in her part. A great film noir film which deserves a better ranking. I'd love to see it again.

This is a relatively unknown film despite thomas gomaz being nominated for best supporting actor. What a shame, since this is a really great film. Although i do think that this is a pretty stupid title. It was also robert montgomery's second film as star and director after 1946's lady in the lake, in which he played phil marlowe.