Having seen most of Nicolas Winding Refn's recent work, it was kind of awkward going back to his debut feature film. While it does show flashes of brilliance, hints of what Refn's style would develop into, for the most part it's your typical "mid-level drug dealer gets in over his head" film that has been many times before (and better). PUSHER follows Frank, a Danish drug dealer who is about to make this huge deal with some Swedes. However, at the moment the deal is about to go down, the cops show up and he has to dump the dope in the river. This puts him in some serious debt to Milo, a Serbian drug lord, and the rest of the film is Frank trying to get the money to pay him back. Before watching this, I did scope a few reviews just to see what kind of film I was getting into, and one comparison I saw a few times was with MEAN STREETS. While I can see the surface similarities, ultimately PUSHER doesn't have as many likable characters and feels more amateurish. Since I don't speak Danish, I can't really say whether the acting was good for sure, but it didn't seem too bad. The production values were also pretty good for a low-budget indie film. Even the script and dialogue weren't too bad. My favorite parts were in the first 20-30 minutes when Frank and his best friend, Tonny (Mads Mikkelsen), share some Tarantino-esque exchanges about whatever was on their minds at the time. However, once the plot kicks in, whatever sense of fun the film had before was all but gone. I don't mind gritty realism, and the cinema verite style in which the film is shot was handled quite well, but I never connected with the story all that much. It also didn't help that Frank was such an unlikeable prick. For my money, Tonny was the most interesting character, but he's not in the film for too long. Fortunately I am aware that Tonny is the focus of the the sequel, so it has that much going for it. Ultimately, PUSHER is a well-made film that shows some of the talent that Refn would later put to great use, but the story has been done many times before, and better.

So in essence, this is a film with true grit. Possibly the grittiest I've seen, literally. Come to think of it, it reminds me of Harlan County, USA documentary, it's dirty, grungy, and perfect for a film with a subject matter this film possesses. Truly, it's as if Nicolas Wending Refn assembled a small crew and started following a real pusher, who gave you an inside look into a week of his life, took you to the seedy, dirty, nasty, harsh (and whatever other synonyms you can throw its way) underworld of the street life so everyone could get an idea of what's it all about and why you probably shouldn't ever get involved. Certainly not a new concept an average man now understands, but it's the way it's all presented that really made me love this film. As I mentioned earlier, the documentary feel of this makes me think Refn had it in his mind when he set out to make this film. The vibe and mood of the film is top notch for the film of this caliber, but really it's the character of Frankie who was fleshed out the most and in the end made me really dig the guy despite essentially who he was, and his profession - though he makes a point later in the film which gives food for thought. What makes it memorable for me is that it isn't devoid of depth, and you get a quick look - which was enough - into each character's life by ways of genuine conversations they're having between each other, which felt like they were ad-libbed, but that's what made it genuine for me.

This is a film about how crime never pays. Literary. Pusher Frank(Kim Bodina) is a middle level drug dealer in Copenhagen. He spends his time hanging out with his drug dealer buddy Tonny(Mads Mikkelsen) doing business and clubbing. He has also a strange psuedoromantic relationship with the hooker "Vic"(Laura Drasbæk). Frank is debt to the drug-lord Milo(Zlatko Buric), but since Milo is a nice guy and Frank is his best friend in Copenhagen he is cool with it as he trust his friend to pay him back. One day Frank get's the chance to do a big deal with the swede Hasse(Peter Andersson). Frank get's the heroin the swede wants to distribute in Malmö, but the cops show up and Frank drops the heroin into a river. Frank's "buddy-debt" has now been blown up to a enormous level, and Milo shows how little friendship means in a world with no morals.This film is a fu***** masterpiece. It's so good that it together with Pusher II: With Blood on my Hands and I'am The Angel of Death: Pusher 3 it manages to even outshine the Godfather- trilogy. Pusher is a dirty and raw ride into the bottom shaft of the Copenhagen-underworld. The criminals are scum, but they are still people. They are like real people with good and bad sides. Every actor in this film is fantastic. Kim Bidina, Laura Drasbæk, Mads Mikkelsen, Slavko Labovic and Zlatko Buric all give wonderful performances. Will cinema ever see a greater gangster character than Milo?During the cause of the film, we get to know more and more about Frank and the more we get to know the more questions pops up. In one scene Frank visits his mother and we learn that Frank grew up in an ordinary middle class home. Why did he become a gangster? What went wrong?The image quality is gritty, it feels more like director Nicolas Winding Refn took his personal 16mm camera and followed a pusher for a week. The film does not feel like a film, but a home-video belonging to a gangster who has filmed his friends for fun. It's honest, authentic and gripping.The music by Peter Peter is great. It feels very much like the stuff you would hear on the radio in the hideout of some Copenhagen mobsters. It's as gritty as the film itself.The ending leaves one speechless. I won't spoil it, but it's unforgiving and breathtaking.

Frank is a drug dealer moving heroin between the level above him and his customer base. When he is asked to get 200 grams of dope in less than 24 hours he balks but when he is offered 700 on the gram he tries to pull it together. Already 50,000 in debt to local gangster Milo, Frank takes a risk and gets the drugs on credit ahead of a good sale. However when the sale goes down the police are tipped off and the only thing saving Frank from jail is his quick wits to dive into the lake and destroy the evidence against him. Released by the police within hours, Frank knows his problems are only beginning as he now owes even more money to Milo – a man not known for his patience.Although I had not really heard any hype over this film, I had heard it compared to Mean Streets in style so I thought I would give it a try. The main thing that struck me was how gritty it was and how lacking in the style and pop culture that the post-Tarantino audience have become accustom to. For some viewers this may be taken as a complaint but for my money it made the film that much better as a piece of dramatic realism as opposed to a modern thriller. Of course "reality" is a loose term in regards this film because I hope I never see this as a world I recognise, but it is still one that I found convincing.Refn's direction helps it by being hand-held and mobile in lots of good locations – the viewer never feels like they are on a set or with jobbing actors. It is perhaps a bit too gritty and slow for some tastes though but I didn't really find much wrong with it in what it tried to do. Perhaps I would have gone for a bit more character development and emotion or maybe it could have lost a bit of running time and been tighter for it, but mostly it was effectively desperate, gritty and with a good feeling of claustrophobic hopelessness. Bodnia does this aspect really well; he is an unsympathetic character but we are taken along with him as he is convincingly real. The film belongs to him but the support cast is mostly good with turns from Buric, Drasbæk, Labovic and Mikkelsen.Overall then a convincing and gritty crime story that reeks of fear and being trapped. It avoids the trappings of modern Tarantino style and instead keeps low to the street, meaning that it does well by aiming for its own target and hitting it consistently.