Pleasures of Sin
Pleasures of Sin
R | 01 May 2001 (USA)
Pleasures of Sin Trailers

The intersection of business and pleasure causes an emotional traffic jam in this erotic drama. Samantha and Steve are a pair of private eyes who are also a couple after hours. The two are hired to set up a surveillance operation in a high-class bordello, and it isn't long before both are tempted by the voluptuous pleasures which surround them. Will their relationship survive? And if not, who will pair off with who?

Reviews
insomniac_rod

Thank you The FilmZone for showing this sleazy soft core sex flick at 1 a.m. I truly enjoyed it. To be honest, I expected a lot more from a sexy cast with McKayla, Dru Berrymore, and of course, the talented Chloe Nicholle (as Rebecca Carter).The production values are truly bad mainly because of the low budget but a little more effort wouldn't harm. For example, the cinematography makes it look like a hard core porno movie. There's absolutely no effort in lightning. But let's ignore that fact because let's be honest, we watched "Pleasures of Sin" because of the high amounts of sex.The sex factor is pretty good and offers steamy, explicit scenes. Chole Nicholle delivers the best performance of the female cast.So my advice is , watch this movie if you are in the mood for good explicit sex or just watch it if you are a fan of Mrs. Nicholle.Recommended only for the sex scenes; don't expect anything else.

... View More
ajs567

This movie is by far one of the worst movies I have ever seen. I would like to describe more of how bad it was, but it seems as though my mind as involuntarily blocked out my memory of this movie; all I remember is it had a horrible plot, bad acting and was pretty much a soft core porno. Hell, this movie didn't even have any good action which might have made it minutely worth watching. The cover of the movie is the most misleading thing I have ever seen in my years of existence. Books, movies or magazines usually portray least a fraction of what is to be found within the story.. the woman on the "bounty huntress" cover isn't even in the movie. It was literally like putting the cover of a Steven segal movie on spice world or something. It made no sense. Don't ever watch this movie if you have any remote value for your life.

... View More
BigHardcoreRed

Maybe a bit harsh, but I have my reasons. To be honest, there is just as much good (as good as straight to video movies get) as bad in this one. I should learn not to judge a movie by the box cover, due to being burned a few times recently by cool looking box covers and absolute crap in the movie. I wouldn't call this movie absolute crap, but it's nothing more than your average B-Movie. Except this B-Movie stars actual porn stars, trying to break through to the other side I presume. Let me explain my problem with this movie starting with the box cover. On the front is a woman dressed very similar to Tomb Raider's Lara Croft. The revealing clothes with black gloves, gun in holster and two grenades around her neck. Nowhere in the movie do they use, need or show a grenade or a gun. I was expecting a low budget Tomb Raider action style movie and instead I got an average low budget movie set in a brothel with zero action.Nothing what I expected which I believe to be the purpose of the box cover.Ranting a little, so I'll go onto my next problem, which is actually the bigger of the two. Dru Berrymore (cleverly disguised as Nicole Hilbig) is not a good actress. She's not even a bad actress. She's not an actress, but a performer in a very different type of movie. The delivery of her lines was not up to par and I don't know if it was a thick accent or what but she annoyed me every time she spoke. In my opinion, she made the movie worse and should have been recast.Chloe, however, billed as Chloe Nichole, did make a somewhat believable brothel madame. Could it be that is because she, too, is "acting" in a very similar way to her other movies? She did have the best scenes in the movie, but quite honestly, that was still not a great performance by any means. Overall, the movie was pretty straightforward, not many plot twists or turns. Everything pretty much goes as expected. I wasn't pulling my hair out waiting for the movie to end, but it was pretty much in the middle of the road. 5 out of 10.

... View More
gunnar_one

This film rates up there with the best of late-night cable offerings. Some might harp on the questionable acting, but then, you're not watching a movie like this for a Grammy-winning performance, are you?I think that the best reason to watch this film is "any scene with Chloe Nicholle"...but that's me. It's interesting to note that she is known for more "hardcore" roles, and yet was clearly the best actor in this picture.As for the "soft-core" scenes...they are some of the hottest out there. If you have a couple of hours to kill at three in the morning, crank up the Digital Cable and give this film a shot.

... View More
You May Also Like