I definitely needed Kate's theme tune at the end. It felt real and honest and not over played like many of these movies are. The score was fantastic and added so much to this movie.

IRREPLACEABLE YOU- 64% The story is unique, with a new way of showing a love tragedy that I dont come across often. The death of the girl is shown in the first shot of the movie and the process of the movie is how the couple could cope and accept it. The story is nice but the structure was boring, the screenplay was uncanny, and the acting wasn't amazing. Story wise and execution: 16/35 Acting: 16/25 Camera work: 16/20 Sound: 16/20

Irreplaceable You is about a couple called Abbie and Sam, who are madly in love with each other. One day Abbie gets the bad news that she has cancer, and tries to set up her fiancé Sam with another woman after her death.Irreplaceable you is directed by producer Stephanie Lang (Veep) in her directorial debut, and wrote by actress Bess Wohl (Flight Plan) in her screenwriting debut. Gugu Mbatha-Raw (Belle) plays Abbie, Michiel Huisman (The Age of Adaline) plays Sam and Steve Coogan (Philomena) plays the wise group therapy leader Mitch.The best thing about this film is easily the acting. Everybody tries, and in some parts I admit to getting teary eyed. But that is about as good as this film gets.First of all, the writer Bess Wohl probably hasn't seen the film Adaption (2002) because she uses narration a lot. However the same shot being used every time narration is used doesn't make it any better, Stephanie Lang does an ok job at best, in my opinion she should probably stick to producing because she seems much better at that. Some of the lines are genuinely cringe worthy at some points in the film, and its like its ticking every romantic film cliché. Even though the concept is fairly original it does not capitalize on it at all making the film seem like a giant missed opportunity. Gugu Mbatha-Raw is having an awful 2018, first The Cloverfield Paradox (2018) now this. She tries her best in both of these films and she seems to be really talented, all she needs is a good script.If you like romantic films or just looking to put something on in the background this film will be okay. Otherwise stay as far away from it as you can.4/10

This film is extremely weird. It tries to be "romantic" and at the same time a comedy and a drama, failing completely in every sense.The characters are terrifying: The woman is dying of cancer, so she decides that it is in the best of her interest to... find her replacement? She starts to look for a partner for her nerdy companion, which is weird for not saying creepy, before he even considers it a problem. She is a manipulative, insane person. In no way should this be considered funny, romantic or something short of insane.Her partner is an absolute zero. His in the movie because someone needed to say that the idea is totally crazy... and still does what she tells him to do. Yeah. Not dependant at all. Tottally logical.The rest of the characters are there because... they needed more than 2 characters. None of them are important. At all. And that is it. Christopher Walken (Seriously man... What happened to you?) is the only character that is kinda likeable, but not enough to save the movie.The plot is bizarre, cringy and it fails constantly in deciding the tone of the film. It fails so hard it is distracting. The actual fun in the movie is that it never decides the adequate tone that it should carry.The cinematography is bland, so is the photography. Nothing spectacular or, at least, remarkable.The makeup is... bad. Honestly bad. For a terminal patient everyone looks pretty good in general with a kinda-pale face. This combined with the mediocre-at-best acting makes the cancer ward patients look like they are about to go to the disco.In short, a cringeworthy piece of non-entertainment about a cancer patient manipulating her way into a bland proffessor of something. Boring as hell, distractingly entertaining by accident from time to time. Do not watch this.