It's the title translated into the English title and a very appropriate at that. A shame in Germany they translated it into "Like in Hell". Why bother doing something like this, if you can translate literally? The narrative of the film is concerned with three women, who all have there problems, dealing with life, but also with something else. Some might have read the novel, on which this movie is based upon, so they know, but for all the others (including me), this is something that will be revealed later. But what happens in between the beginning and the end of the movie, is a great drama, that deals with life and everyday problems. You have three strong female performers here, that work great with the superb script they are given here. This is as gripping as life can sometimes be!

I'd like to begin by saying that while this film undoubtedly shows the talents of its actual director, for the sake of this commentary I will assume it is a movie by Krysztof Kieslowski. I suppose this movie needs to be viewed together with Tom Tykwer's "Heaven" (2002) in order to be understood from a broader perspective (I don't think anyone has directed "Purgatory" yet, the third part of the trilogy suggested by Kieslowski). Another important source for understanding the film is perhaps Dante's "La Divina Commedia", since this is what inspired Kieslowski in the first place.What the film does, I think, is to offer the viewer a set of disturbing stories, from the very first opening sequence of the bird hatching and pushing the other eggs out of the nest; All these stories, right to the end of the film, never reach any satisfactory resolution. Character's lives are simply damaged or destroyed by events based on misunderstanding or ignorance, as well as human fallibility. Perhaps this is what makes for the film's theme of "Hell". If this is so, and here I can only guess at what Kieslowski's original intentions might have been, then "L'Enfer" is a very modern film in it's representation of hell as the presence of unresolved, arbitrary trauma in human life - hence perhaps the professor's speech about destiny and coincidence is of central significance in understanding the movie. This may in fact be the question the movie is supposed to put to its audience: is life a matter of destiny, or is it just coincidence? This film therefore shares with all other works directed or inspired by Kieslowski that director's strengths, as well as his weaknesses. Kieslowski had a genius for translating transcendent concepts into immanent imagery, and showing the viewer the place where eternity and time coincide; "La Double Vie de Veronique" may be the best example of this. However, that same Polish genius tended to skim lightly over the harsher, more troubling aspects of human tragedy - I would have liked to have seen him attempt a movie about the holocaust, or the life of Job, because I think shadow, while not entirely missing, is nevertheless a little too stylised in his films. Evil is unfortunately real, and while there may be light at the end of every tunnel, the way there gets very dark indeed. A great filmmaker has a responsibility to show this, especially when dealing with universal themes. Hell is not a place that has the good looks of Emanuelle Beart (funnily enough, this actress also starred in a 1994 movie with the same title)! Overall, a movie worth watching.

Apologies for the summary line, which I simply cannot resist. The first two of the late, legendary director Kieslowski's legacy of the trilogy which, he presumably was going to make himself, were acquired by two highly respected directors. Tom Tykwer (Lola Rennt) made "Heaven" a few years ago and Danis Tanovic (No Man's Land) made "Hell" (L'Enfer) last year.One thing immediately noticeable about L'Enfer is style. Director Tanovic seems very fond of using vertical shots (reminding me strangely the stabbing scene in "Psycho" – not the shower scene, of course). It was a while ago when I watched "No Man's Land" but I don't recall similar shots. This may be viewed as director Tanovic's versatility in employing the camera, as in the 360 degree shot that accentuate the protagonist's emotion. Also used quite extensively is silhouette, to various degrees, showing a dark object against light in the background. Coincidence or not, director Tykwer also used silhouette in "Heaven", but the impact of that scene is so dumbfounding that by comparison, silhouette scenes in L'Enfer are only pale shadows.While Heaven has flashes of controversial and provocative ideas as well as rich symbolism throughout, Hell stays on traditional, sometime even melodramatic ground, leading us through a web of tragic human traits – doubt, infidelity, selfishness, to mention just a few. The use of Medea, the tragedy of tragedies in Greek mythology, as the subject of a college project is not incidental. The elements of misunderstanding, deceit, vengeance and unforgiving stubbornness underpin the tragedy surrounding the three sisters haunted by a nightmarish childhood experience.Sophie, tormented by her gnawing resentment of an unfaithful husband, is played by Emmanuelle Beart who will be remembered by those who have seen Ozon's "8 women" as the subtly sexy maid Louise. Attractive and unsophisticated Anne (Marie Gillian) is hopelessly attached to her professor who has a daughter about her own age. Subdued Celine (Karin Viard) is left with the task of providing occasional company to their partially incapacitated mother, wheel-chair bound and unable to talk (but can write). Appearance of what appears to be an unlikely, handsome suitor turns up dark hidden secrets that was the common root of the tragic heritage of the sisters. More I'll not reveal.Hell is well crafted, beautifully shot, capably acted and provides keen insights that will be reflected on. And yet, it just lacks that innovative spirit that puts Heaven one notch above it.

Danis Tanovic continues his Oscar worthy ways with L'Enfer.A complete departure from the film that "No Man's Land" is, L'Enfer is visually beautiful with intricate interwoven plot lines.The film starts out seemingly slow, a jumble of scenes with no obvious relevance or message starting with the opening title sequence. Yet as the film unfolds, early scenes come increasingly into focus, with ever intensifying clarity of understanding and pertinence.The primary cast including Emmanuelle Beart, Karin Viard, and Marie Gillain, are brilliant, all showing top performances.Will Tanovic receive another Oscar nod for L'Enfer? Probably not, but this film is certainly deserving of attention.