With so many lame, low-budget horror DVDs misleading fans through the use of salacious cover-art, carefully selected stills, and provocative blurb, it's nice to find one that finally makes good on its packaging's promise of copious amounts of sex and violence.Flesh for the Beast is not a great film by any stretch of the imagination—the story is clichéd nonsense, the acting is average at best (even from its two 'names', Caroline Munro and Aldo Sambrell), and the direction is uninspired—but it does feature enough gratuitous full-frontal female nudity and gruesome gore to satisfy most depraved viewers' lust for flesh, whether it be for the pink and supple kind, or the ragged, red and bloody variety.As in Armand Weston's The Nesting (1981), Roberta Findlay's Blood Sisters (1987) and Lucio Fulci's The Ghosts of Sodom (1988), writer/director Terry West's Flesh for the Beast is set in a building that used to be a brothel, and which is now the centre of terrifying paranormal activity. The owner of the building, John Stoker (Sergio Jones) hires a team of parapsychologists to try and cleanse the property, but one-by-one the visitors are seduced and killed by the evil succubi that dwell there.This rather cheesy set-up might not be that original, but it does allow for plenty of sleazy shenanigans, with the demons first appearing as randy young women in order to shag their intended victims, before eventually turning nasty and yanking out their internal organs and generally making a lot of mess: during the course of the film, Jones is absolutely drenched in the red stuff, one guy pukes up his guts (literally), the naked ladies playing the succubi writhe enthusiastically in a pool of blood and assorted organs, and even Caroline Munro joins in the bloody fun, having her throat cut at the end of her one brief scene.Having seen a ton of low-budget horror way worse than Flesh for the Beast, I am genuinely surprised by the mostly disparaging comments here on IMDb. Don't people like honest-to-goodness sex and blood in their horror anymore?

What a Film, Very Bloody in Details, But the Lady's are very sexy and naughty with Nudity. it is really a bloke film and its very good. There are a lot of bad reviews but trust me it worth watching because it is a mess up film but great. A B side film with a twist. the horror and flashbacks is great, the film is Cert: 18 for a reason, the film reminds me of Hell Asylum, There is a uncut version at thats what i got, i don't know what the cut version like probley less blood overview a 9/10 Film, I don't know why the reviews are bad because it worth watching and buying, Great Film, The Lady's are sexy with Nudity the blood Details are just the best if you liked Hell Asylum and mixed up film just your thing.

This movie was beyond bad, and this comes from someone who normally appreciates a modicum of awfulness in a horror film. Terry West must have won the lottery to be able to bankroll such craptacular films like this and Playmate Of The Apes, The Sexy Sixth Sense, etc., etc. The only redeemable quality this film has (and the reason I bothered to rent it) is the Buckethead soundtrack, but I recommend purchasing a Praxis album rather than bother with this.I'm embarrassed for Carolyn Munro, who's been in such classics as the Dr. Phibes movies, Captain Kronos - Vampire Hunter, The Golden Voyage Of Sinbad and others. Even Slaughter High was better than this, Carolyn. Shame on you.The positive reviews seem to come from people who really appreciated the nudity. Just a quick note - it's not the only film to show boobs, and adults can even purchase porn, which has tons and tons of boobs in it. In fact, most porn has better writing and acting than this crapfest. For those who seemed to like the gore, there are better gore flicks. In fact, you could recreate the gore in this movie with a full bottle of Heinz 57 and some chunks of latex in your own home, and even that would be more entertaining.

Excuse me, but I had to puke just remembering this film (if you can call it that).Okay, who lets these people buy cameras and sneak their crap into the movie system? I started checking who makes the movies before I rent them, but this one slipped through,and believe me, the company is added to my "don't rent" list...right up there with Fangoria.Don't get me wrong, I allow a lot of gray area for lower budget movies, because I am a die hard Horror fan, but I still believe if you spend money, you should at least be entertained, even if it is poorly.This, on the other hand was one of those movies that don't do anything. I think at one point, I forgot to take it off of pause when I came back from wandering around outside out of boredom and it was in screen saver mode. It took me a few minutes of thinking the action was getting better to realize that it was the name of the DVD player floating around the screen, and I put it into "play" mode, missing the screen saver already.Hands down, this is a movie that shouldn't have ended up in the rental place. If folks want these, get them from Rhino, don't torture us normal people by sneaking them into the actual movies by making a cool cover, distracting us with boobs and neat monster art, fooling us int renting them.