Feast III: The Happy Finish
Feast III: The Happy Finish
R | 17 February 2009 (USA)
Feast III: The Happy Finish Trailers

The survivors are saved by the mysterious prophet Short Bus Gus, who seemingly has the ability to control the beasts. He leads them into the sewers as they travel to the big city. Along the way they get help from karate expert Jean-Claude Seagal and learn that the beasts originate from a place called The Hive. Armed with this knowledge, they decide to fight back and destroy the beasts.

Reviews
bowmanblue

If you like cheesy (and gory) horror then you'll probably have seen the original 'Feast' film. It was nice and compact, with plenty of claret spewing all over the place, not to mention a few surprising moments which deliberately defied convention. Then came the second chapter, which did its best to 'up the ante' and be more outrageous and generally more violent. It succeeded, but somehow it lost all its charm.'Part III' was made back to back with Part II and therefore feels exactly like the second half. Sadly, although it too contains extreme violence and black humour, it doesn't compare to the original. Just like Part II, the characters are unlikeable, the monsters look like big men in rubber suits and the story sort of ambles from set-piece to set-piece.When I'm the mood for a story like 'Feast' I'll watch all three. Parts II and III have their moments, but the original was best and always will be. If you're just a casual horror fan, stick with the first one and avoid the second pair.http://thewrongtreemoviereviews.blogspot.co.uk/

... View More
bjjnedan

The Happy Finish is just plain bad. It's pretty much just like the first two, except much, much stupider. And..., the hot chicks that made the 1st one memorable and the 2nd less so, died off. Much like 2, I wanted every single person, except for 1 hot chick, to die a very horrible death. Everybody is just plain retarded. Nothing about this movie, or even the entire trilogy, makes any sense. Everything, the acting, the special and monster effects, the plot, the ending, the dialogue, every single f***ing thing about this movie is just plain stupid. Think about any trilogy and remember how bad the 3rd movie was in comparison to the 1st and/or 2nd? Well..., this is a whole new level of terrible. For some very stupid reason, the Feast trilogy seems to have a cult following. That makes me sad to know there are so many stupid people in this world and fearful of where life on Earth is headed.

... View More
Arlis Fuson

As part 2 left us on the roof , this movie picks up right where it left off. In fact it kind of rewinds a bit and goes in to more details about the ways and means of death caused to the last few murdered in part 2. This movie is the same cast, or surviving cast and takes them off the roof and into the jail where they have to deal with the meth head hobo and soon a new hero named "Sh*tkicker" - Thye find meth heads secret meth lab which is a school bus underground and they hijack it. They eventually meet a cape wearing (Obi-Wan Kenobi wanna be) man named prophet who has a power over the creatures (we soon find its a weak power) Prophet leads them underground where they meet a young martial arts bad boy named Jean Claude Segal and they stay underground forever trying to stay alive and find a way into the city through the sewers. All kinds of wild twist and turns happen as they try to reach their bloody yet happy finish.Worst of the 3 and the main reason for that in my opinion was the fact it was so dark, the underground scenes are dark and hard to follow. The monsters aren't as present here and once underground they meet weird people who are psychotic and have nothing to do with the story at all, yet they have to fight and kill them. The whole underground part (which was most of the movie) was horrible. The new characters were all rather dull with the exception of Jean-Claude. The movie seemed to go downhill from the trilogy and was just very disappointing. It had a completely different and very unoriginal feel to it.John's direction was good, but it was sloppy and dark most of the time. Mike Leahy was back on production and he might be a big part of the problem I am not sure. Edward's music failed here too, and the writing duo of Dunstan and Melton seemed thrown together and careless. There was even a crappy ending with a gigantic terminator looking robot that made no sense and the movie ends with a Mariachi singer doing a Spanish theme song to tie all 3 films in. Craig Henningten did great as Jean-Claude and Tom Gulager was amazing playing his part with a piece of metal stuck through his entire head.. and of course Clu is always good.It was good ONLY if you like the first two, which I did greatly, but it goes down hill as the movie progresses... The song mentions a part 4 but I hope that doesn't happen.5/10 stars

... View More
lastliberal

Better than II or worse then II? There is some debate on that.At least we can clearly see the monsters in this one.The gore is worse than ever with decapitations, and the monster eating the head whole, and then, I kid you not, eliminating the uneaten head.If you have epilepsy, you might not want to watch the last 10 minutes or so. It flashes on and off and it made me dizzy.It was better that Feast II, but not by much. It was a gore-fest with lots of action, but it was hard to follow exactly what was going on most of the time.The ending was a real shock!

... View More
You May Also Like