Conspiracy
Conspiracy
R | 15 February 2008 (USA)
Conspiracy Trailers

A Gulf War veteran with PTSD (Kilmer) heads to a small town to find his friend. When he arrives his friend and his family have vanished and the townsfolk afraid to answer questions about their disappearance. He soon discovers that the town is owned and controlled by one man (Gary Cole) and he doesn't like people asking questions.

Reviews
Tom

This film seems to be a combination of two earlier films; Bad Day at Black Rock, and First Blood. In fact several scenes are practically identical frame for frame. A little originality in those particular scenes would've been better. But no biggie.The story heads down its own path when descriptions of what the USA has been doing in (and after) every war we've been stuck in since WWII. We go in, destroy everything in sight, eventually get out, then send in the same companies to rebuild they mess they made. The brave men and women who gave their lives mean absolutely nothing except a way for those companies to get rich. It's been a national disgrace for decades. This film brings that corruption to light, but judging by many of these reviews those traitorous companies are also stacking reviews in their favor. It's actually quite funny. Even a blind man could see it.

... View More
bigred1

I watched Conspiracy last night, and wanted my hour and half back. Before going into the plot, I fould myself cheering for the "bad guys" to win, since I cared not for the "good guy" and not really caring that he could die or be hurt. I thought the "betrayal" of the police officer was stupid and I could see it coming a mile away. The villains were over the top and were not slightly sympathetic. Plotwise, this was a pure propaganda piece for the Hollywood Left, and the leftists out there. If you don't support illegals in America and hate American business, you are a bigoted murderer. Such a simple plot should be seen through by everyone, but I noticed a number of reviewers were taken in by the propaganda. It is not the fact that this movie would have been produced by Goebbels himself that makes it bad, it is the fact that Goebbels would be embarrassed to put his name to it as an example of ametueristic propaganda. Following these black marks, any objective person would reject the message of the movie itself. It clearly was made to change people over to the addled liberal viewpoint, and in keeping with their only method of conversion, doesn't use facts or dicta to do so. Their opponents are shown to be wholly reprehensible people, and the poor man's Eva Menedes (Jennifer Esposito) explains that America is horrible and its greatest soldier must bring it down. Utter rubbish, and a purely emotional plea. The ONLY redeemed quality occurs in the first five minutes of the movie. Alesia Riabenkova's breasts are quite stunning, and she is a very beautiful woman. Her body is the only reason this movie deserves a positive star rating (and the fact that IMDb doesn't let you put them up there).

... View More
dredyoung

Another of America's Dirty Little Corporate Secrets I watched a movie the other night called "Conspiracy" (2008 staring Val Kilmer). It had received somewhat poor reviews. This was justified for a professional movie critic who bases their critique on traditional, Hollywood, Oscar-like standards. However, I saw it as a great 'message movie'. I knew a little about the controversy over Mexican immigrant legislation, a little about the Maquiladores, as well as a little about the worldwide exploitation of underdeveloped countries by US corporations, so I immediately became engrossed in the movie. This movie is a valid dramatization of what American corporations have been doing for many decades now. In the movie, Halliburton and Brown and Root and other such companies are all accurately portrayed by their compression into the movie's one 'fictitious' corporation, Halicorp. The movie also accurately represents the true situation with respect to Mexican 'illegals'. Americans have been employing them to do our dirty, hard work while keeping the death scythe of deportation or arrest over their heads to keep them working for slave wages which they need to save their families in Mexico from starvation. A conveniently opportunistic system has been devised whereby US corporations undermine Mexican corporations and make it impossible for Mexicans to earn a living in Mexico. Consequently, Mexican laborers have to flee to the US and take below subsistence wages. The only other alternative for them has been the Maquiladoras. In the beginning, the Maquiladoras were supposed to help the Mexican cities along the border economically but this turned into a nightmare as the US corporations exploited, virtually raped, the cities and their people who had come in the millions to live along the US-Mexican border and make a decent living. Eventually, these corporations moved on to cheaper slave labor in underdeveloped countries that were even worse off. Those border towns turned into impoverished garbage heaps. Those Mexican workers, therefore, had no choice but to swim across the border river or the climb border fences to find slave-wage work in the US. Those who take the time to inquire and those with eyes and ears to see and to hear with their hearts know, understand, and grieve for these Mexican Maquiladores workers and Mexican immigrant workers and their families who are caught in the tragic trap laid for them by the US corporations. There are those who know much of this and are happy to benefit from such dastardly exploitation. Yet, there are some caring few who create sanctuary churches and cities to care for desperate 'illegals' and their shattered families and often even sequester them from local 'de jure' police who are really serving as 'de facto' henchmen, a kind of recrudescent form of the KKK, for local businesses. On the other hand, there are these unconscionably insensitive, narcissistic, obsessively acquisitive employers who find all sorts of convenient ways to rationalize and blithely transform the plight of their Mexican illegal slave workers so as to make it seem like they are actually providing them with a great blessing, in fact, saving them. The white, well-to-do, ordinary American employers also rationalize this villainous behavior by seeing themselves as superior, a kind of unofficial master race, and their non-white slave workers as somewhat like mongrel dogs that must be kept from citizenship in order to prevent a pollution of our pure genes and true American heritage. The movie drives home a final thrust by revealing the xenophobic bigotry of the Halicorp types like Rhodes, the local head of Halicorp, when Rhodes, attacks and demeans retired Special Ops Marine William, whom he thinks he has beaten, for being half American Indian and half Anglo American. War-hero McPherson is the stranger-newly-come-to-town who successfully defends the town, New Lago, and its 'illegal alien' workers against Rhodes and his puppet Sheriff, deputies, and other complicit locals who were acting as Rhodes' thugs out of fear for their lives,. In the end, the people of New Lago, 'emblematic of the vast majority of ordinary people', finally rise up and turn against Rhodes, "emblematic of corporate American CEOs", demonstrating that, after all is said and done, America is a land of non-xenophobic, non-bigoted, non-exclusionist, multi-colored, multi-racial immigrants. On the other hand, however, in America, we know there are a great many Americans who simply choose to look the other way and let this corrupt and calamitous situation with our decent immigrant workers putrefy. Many are aware that this same type of exploitation by American Corporations is taking place in underdeveloped countries all over the globe and do nothing. Finally, there are the perpetrators who are running these US-legitimized criminal operations and hosts of right-wing political and media lackeys who are aligned with them. For these criminal corporations, Halicorp is the perfect, 'grotesques' symbol!

... View More
lschwarz90

I was very curious about this movie, because it contained two names: val kilmer and jennifer esposito. but after the first 20minutes i was very sad: this movie is a waste of time. really. now if u wonder why i watched it until the end (cause i did), that has only one reason: jennifer esposito. she is a way more better actress than val kilmer ever be. his acting is awful, and he can't carry the movie. this can only be done by jennifer esposito, who plays kilmers love interest...sadly she has not so many scenes. so i only give this movie 3 out of 10, which is the best i can do.. it's a waste of time, and it's boring, sometimes even ridiculous.

... View More