This western tells the story of the eponymous Chief Crazy Horse from his childhood, to his leadership of the Lakota Sioux and finally on to his death. When we first see him he is a child watching on as a dying chief prophesies that one day a Lakota will unite the tribes and defeat the invading white men; he also says that ultimately that man will die at the hands of a fellow Lakota. The boy walks off and has a vision that leads him to believe that he may be the one the chief spoke of. The next time we see him he is an adult being attacked but three men from an enemy tribe; he kills all three of them and notices that the feathers on one of their lances are those from his vision. A short while later a woman in the tribe brings an injured white man, by the name of Twist, into their village; he recovers and becomes friends with Crazy Horse. Some time later Crazy Horse marries the woman which leads to his rival Little Big Man being expelled from the village and heading to the Army camp at Ft Laramie. Here traders see that Little Big Man possesses some gold; he says it came from their sacred burial grounds in the Black Hills. A treaty with the Lakota promised that no white men would attempt to enter their territory but the discovery of gold soon proved the value of that treaty. As prospectors entered the territory the army followed. They did not expect the Lakota to fight back effectively but under Crazy Horse's leadership they had several notable victories leading up to the famous rout where Custer's forces were annihilated at the Battle of Little Big Horn. Unfortunately the other chiefs assumed that this victory was the end of the war and headed off to hunt to fill their winter larders; inevitably they were picked off and either died or ended up in the reservations. Crazy Horse continued alone until his wife became ill then he too surrendered, not because he was defeated but because he knew that only the medicine at the fort could save her.This is an interesting film with many pros and cons; the most obvious con is the fact that all the key Lakota characters are played by white actors in make up; something that would almost certainly not happen today; however it is to the maker's credit that they told the story from the side of the Lakota at a time when most westerns depicted the Native population as antagonists holding up the 'progress of civilisation'. Once you get over the fact that the actors weren't Indian their performances are pretty good and the story was well told; when the battles occur they are low scale but fairly exciting... except for the Battle of Little Bighorn... here the camera just points away and shows us some ominous clouds for a while... I guess the producers couldn't afford to film such a big battle! No doubt a few liberties were taken with the facts but at least it was filmed in the Black Hills of South Dakota where the events portrayed took place eighty years before not in California like so many westerns. The photography looked great; it is just a pity that when it was on television it wasn't shown in its original Cinemascope format; I'm sure that would have looked even more impressive. While this isn't the best western I've seen I'd certainly recommend it to fans of the genre; it made such a refreshing change to see these events for the side of the Indians.

This is the story of Crazy Horse, who from a very young age was expected to go onto great things for his people. Taking in his youth and finally onto his accent as military leader, Chief Crazy Horse tells things from the Indian point of view.This is a good and reliable Western picture, though sadly not using Indian actors to ram home the fact it's telling things from the Indian side of the vista, it's none the less unharmed by Victor Mature (Crazy Horse) and the rest of the white man cast. It's difficult for myself to personally gauge just what the makers were aiming for, was it honest portrayals? Or did they hope to make a stirring picture about a man proclaimed as a true great American General? Because they really don't achieve either of those things. But as I have said in my heading, this film doesn't waste one's time, it is a very interesting story, and technically it has its treats (filming in the actual Black Hills location a definite bonus for the story), yet ultimately I came away thinking that we could still do with a rousing epic to fully capture this man's biography. Because ultimately it's a story well worth telling and a story worth telling with grace and elegance. 5/10

This fine western traces the life of the Sioux warrior, from the time when he received his vision as a boy, his battles against red and white enemies, and finishes with his betrayal and murder by a fellow Lakota. Victor Mature is good as the Lakota warrior who is one of the most tragic figures in western history. The film examines the petty disputes among the Indians who could not present a unified front in the face of white westward expansion, especially the rush to the Black Hills in search of gold. The film shows two of Crazy Horse's famous battles, the Fetterman and Rosebud engagements to good effect but the Custer fight gets only a brief mention and is glossed over almost as an afterthought. The widescreen CinemaScope is excellent and bathes the beautiful landscapes of the Black Hills and the Badlands with beautiful color. The music by Frank Skinner is a dramatic and heroic accompaniment to a fine film that pays tribute to a great American.

Typical for its time, this is a well-intentioned biography of (as it states) "one of America's greatest generals". Real Indians appear in the background, and, like they were in Ford films, they are great scene-stealers. Victor Mature, Ray Danton, and Suzan Ball are quite good. Better-than-average script, but the action scenes are only fair (it was not an expensive movie, and it seems that the violence, especially in Custer's last stand, is underplayed to accentuate War as a necessity and not a pleasure). Good Remingtonesque photography, filmed in the Black Hills.