This is what the scary movie series should have been!!Heaps of vampire in-jokes as newly changed vamps, not aware of their situation fall prey to clichéd accidental killings. I laughed out loud all the way through. The dialog contains many great quips, and there is of course a bean eating and subsequent farting scene.The biggest problem was the way it would change between night and day between scenes. This was annoying, but not so much to stop me thoroughly enjoying this movie.And then there was one-eyed Lurlene...

I was actually a part of the film making process of this movie, the script is a delight to read, and the movie is pretty funny in an immature sort of way, coupled with quite a few scenes with some gratuitous nudity, entertaining and disgustingly so. not a movie to expect to watch twice, but funny the first time or two. most of the effects were done in a makeshift last minute way, and almost all of the movie was done in a single house. other movies to check out by Joe Sherlock are dreamwalkers, mars vs. the pope, or twisted illusions. I'd recommend the movie if you're looking for something that's funny without worrying about being good, and don't mind dick and fart jokes. I hope it's as fun to watch as it is to make.

I got the movie on the basis of the title alone. I'm a sucker for the patently ridiculous - and in this case, redundant - titles of old. So getting the movie just on the title, I wasn't exactly expecting high art when I sat down to watch it. At first, it filled all my expectations about the kind of film this was going to be. Terrible lighting? Check. Bad Sound? Check. Lousy Performances? With a few exceptions, check. Though as the movie continued, I found myself laughing with the film, not at it. The main thrust of the comedy comes in the form of some wonderfully strange characters, Cletus (a foul-mouthed, beer-swilling dwarf with a penchant for peeping tomery), Jean-Claude (pronounced "Cleurghd", a sexually ambiguous french interior decorator stuck in redneck hell) and the villain of the piece, Catherine (an eastern European vampire, lumbered with the worst sidekick in film history). Little moments in the film, such as Ma Poissier's exclamation of delight, "I won a free room refit from Bull Inseminatin', Room Redecoratin' magazine!" show the potential of the film, but the director's over-reliance on toilet jokes for humour grows old very quickly.Given more time and a bit more money, I'd like to see what else Sherlock & Hegg could come up with.

Greetings,When I watch low-budget movies (there seems to be no limit to the amount that hit the TV with washed up stars looking for their next paycheck.) It's nice when once in a while you land upon a flick that exists simply for the fun of it.RedNeck BloodSucking Vampires is such a movie I rate by how well it entertained me. I don't think it quite is a 10, but seeing how some others felt necessary to really drag it through the mud, I had to balance the score.The use of Vampires in the story is (yes) only a gimeck to get suckers like us (no pun intended, seriously) to take an interest in something that we wouldn't likely watch if it didn't say it was about vampires.This movie was very entertaining, in a sick, I laugh at fart jokes, kind of way. Com'mon, you tell me Austin Powers isn't more than bathroom humor?The story centers around (sorry no spoilers) who is tasked with the job of re-decorating some god-awful room (off-screen) in a typical RedNeck household at "The Pissings" residence. (not sure if it's really spelled like that.) The Re-Decorator is befriended by Junior Pissing and his pal Cletus, you get to see all the horrid stuff this outsider is experiencing for the first time. And near the end of the flick most of the locals are vampires. Some story eh, but it works, only because the dialogue keeps ripping out good one-liners in RedNeck lingo that keep peeling the layers off your funny bone.To top it off, there's a Vampiress thrown into the mix, through various short scenes, has the town infected as her new (brainless) army of the undead. Like I said, the movie could have been funny on its own without the vampire theme, but then why would I have taken the time to watch it? I've seen a lot of tripe lately, especially in Vampire flicks, Vampire 3000 bored me so to tears, I wanted suck my eyeballs out through a straw. And then comes ultra low budget movies, to the rescue from our film tedium. It might have benefited from some more editing, (Two of the three nude scenes were unnecessary) but for what its worth, it entertains. (BTW- I know some of you are thinking I could have benefited from a speel cheker on this thing, duely noted.)If you ever get the chance (I saw it on TV not too long ago) to see Jesus Christ: Vampire Hunter, that movie has a lot of fun to it. This one kind of reminded me of it in a way, both were silly romp flicks, and in some way involved vampires.Best Scene in the Movie: Poor Earl, I never saw him ending up like that, completely blindsided me with that shocker. Nasty, yet amusing.Bottom Line: It's strongest point is the wity (or witless) dialogue, that encompases a slew of interestingly unkept characters, and all the sick antics along the way. But the vampire aspect is merely used as a place to begin, continue and end the story, never really seeing the full potential, apart from the biting of necks, and local vamps doing idiotic things that vanquish themselves.It's not a good movie, it's just fun, rude and silly. But everyone needs a good laugh and RNBSV will deliver the beans, so to say.