Big Boy was a complete shock to me, a 1930 picture that was vibrant, funny,bizarre and very entertaining. I bought it expecting to see a train-wreck,a politically-incorrect minstrel show featuring a white actor performing in black-face. Not just for a scene or two mind you, but for the entire picture(save for the very end)!!! What I got was a fabulous performance by Al Jolson,who is frankly so good here it's almost scary. He's funny, charming, sings wonderfully and performs with a sort of wink-wink to the audience, as if he knows he's in a ridiculous situation as an actor and wants everyone else to know it. His asides are often hilarious,and frankly he is so good overall that if he had chosen to play the part in normal black makeup, without the exaggerated lips common with black-face, I honestly think he would've disappeared into his role completely and truly transcended his makeup. The plot is almost completely beside the point-it exists simply to provide a frame-work for a series of wonderful musical interludes.There is one extended flashback sequence that appears almost out of nowhere, and is so wild and broadly played that I don't think anyone who sees it will ever quite forget it. Print quality is sometimes excellent, and often-times poor. This picture is in definite need of some restoration. I have to applaud those who decided in this sensitive age to release a movie as bizarre and potentially offensive as this one,and I'd like to think that it's because they trust us to be adults and apply some context to what we're watching. If the very idea of black-face portrayals offend you, this picture is to be avoided at all costs. If you can place the use of it into a proper context, this picture might still offend you, but at least you won't keep yourself from watching a wonderfully bizarre and surreal little curio. The ending to my mind is fabulous,by the way.

Big Boy (1930) ** (out of 4) Al Jolson was only able to bring two of his Broadway shows to Hollywood and this here was the first of the duo. In the film Jolson plays Gus, a black servant who dreams of one day being able to ride horses. He finally gets his chance when his owner's horse appears to be good enough for the race but of course a few issues are going to break out. Controversy will always follow Jolson since he often appeared in blackface but I've seen so many Hollywood films from this period to where I'm at the point of looking at it as the norm. It was certainly the norm in 1930 so it's doubtful too many went to the theater and saw this film the same way we would today. With that said, appearing in blackface is one thing but having the entire role done in blackface, when viewed today, just seems wrong on so many levels. I'm sure a black actor could have done this part and made for an entertaining movie but due to the times this just wasn't going to happen. The truth of the matter is that Jolson might be hated or looked down by many but I always try to judge things as honest as possible and there's no denying that he's very good in the part. I thought Jolson was very believable in the part of Gus and I think he managed to really bring the character to life as he made us feel for the character and made us want to see him reach his dreams. The "performance" is just fine as are a majority of the music numbers, which he also performs. 'Dixie', 'What Will I Do Without You?' and 'Tomorrow is Another Day' are the highlights of the group as the actor does a terrific job singing them but there are some nice visuals put to them as well. No one in the supporting cast really jumps out at you but then again this movie was made to show off Jolson and Jolson only. I think the biggest problem is the actual screenplay that appears to be missing a lot of footage that might have been in the Broadway play. The "story" appears to be missing quite a bit as the film seems to just want to get to the next music number. Another problem is that the comedy is flatly done and the majority of the jokes just fall flat on their face. Many people will look at BIG BOY is disgust and I understand that but it's one of the few ways to see what type of role Jolson did on stage and for that reason alone this remains an important picture for film buffs.

...largely because of the fact that by the autumn of 1930, when this film was released, musical films were a sure fire miss at the box office. However, Jolson still owed Warner Brothers one more film to fulfill his contract. Thus they came up with the idea that Jolson should reenact his role as Gus in one of his Broadway hits, "Big Boy". This would allow Jolson to sing but be more likely to attract audiences. This required Jolson to do the entire film in black-face as a black man who is a servant on a plantation. If this had been done seriously I'm sure it would leave modern audiences aghast. However, let me assure you that through the entire film Jolson, as Gus, is kidding the audience. Let me also assure you that Gus is smarter than the family that employs him. I doubt most of them could reason their way out of a paper bag without his assistance. Gus' family has been serving the Bedford family for generations. Specifically, Gus is trainer and jockey for the Bedford family prize horse, Big Boy. However, one member of the family has written a bad check to a girl in the city, and a gambler is using that as a threat to the young man so that he can fix the results of the Kentucky Derby. Under fear of being sent to jail if the bad check is reported to the police, the young man gets Gus fired so that a jockey that will throw the Kentucky Derby can be hired to ride Big Boy. It sounds like serious stuff, but believe me the whole thing is performed tongue-in-cheek, at least Jolson's part is.Just because 1930 audiences had their fill of musicals did not mean they had their fill of Jolson, so at the conclusion of the film Jolson is introduced as himself without makeup to sing one song. I'd recommend this one, but you have to like Jolson and you have to remember that this film was made eighty years ago and that no harm was intended by any of the characterizations.

Now the movie is far from politically correct. But it was made in 1930! Jolson is at his funniest. Sure, he's in blackface for almost all of the film, but this film serves as an historical recording of one of Jolson's biggest Broadway successes. Many people lump Cantor and Jolson together as similar type performers because both did blackface routines. But where Cantor played the scared little man (and played it very seriously, making it all even funnier), Jolson played the aggressive braggart. Jolson's Gus is a wise cracking schemer. His Gus is no Uncle Tom! Jolson is often the butt of the joke and this is a good thing. It softens his aggressiveness and makes him more human. I am only glad that with his massive ego, Jolson allowed himself to be the butt of jokes. The final punch line of the film is side splitting and is a wonderful inside joke. We need to look at these films with a 1930s mentality. We have advanced greatly in the area of tolerance, but we should not condemn performers like Al Jolson and Eddie Cantor who were only appealing to the popular tastes of their time.